Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs STNFX
GFAFX vs STNFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs STNFX
GFAFX vs STNFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. STNFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and STNFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. STNFX (953M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than STNFX: GFAFX (0.20) vs STNFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than STNFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs STNFX (16 years). STNFX (0.85) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). STNFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than STNFX: GFAFX (250) vs STNFX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. STNFX (-4.04). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. STNFX (-20.14).
| GFAFX | STNFX | GFAFX / STNFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.70 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.85 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 4.374 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 953M | 37,461% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -4.04 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.15 | 10.27 | 381% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | -20.14 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.45 | 0.42 | 24,530% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement