Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TGFRX
GFAFX vs TGFRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TGFRX
GFAFX vs TGFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TGFRX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and TGFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TGFRX (38.1M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TGFRX: GFAFX (0.20) vs TGFRX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TGFRX: GFAFX (25 years) vs TGFRX (28 years). TGFRX (1.95) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TGFRX (23.35). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGFRX: GFAFX (250) vs TGFRX (2000). TGFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.92 vs. GFAFX (0.26). TGFRX return over 5 years is better than : 51.08 vs. GFAFX (11.44).
| GFAFX | TGFRX | GFAFX / TGFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.95 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.95 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.647 | 12.927 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 38.1M | 937,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.26 | 21.92 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.14 | 74.52 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.44 | 51.08 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.31 | 212.17 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement