Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TLGCX
GFAFX vs TLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TLGCX
GFAFX vs TLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TLGCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and TLGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TLGCX (332M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TLGCX: GFAFX (0.20) vs TLGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TLGCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs TLGCX (22 years). TLGCX (2.32) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). TLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TLGCX: GFAFX (250) vs TLGCX (1000). GFAFX (4.25) and TLGCX (4.10) have marching annual gain over last year. GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. TLGCX (-0.62).
| GFAFX | TLGCX | GFAFX / TLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.19 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.32 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 18.696 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 332M | 107,530% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 4.10 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.15 | 19.88 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | -0.62 | -2,545% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.45 | 54.15 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement