Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TLGCX
GFAFX vs TLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TLGCX
GFAFX vs TLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TLGCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and TLGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. TLGCX (327M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TLGCX: GFAFX (0.20) vs TLGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TLGCX: GFAFX (26 years) vs TLGCX (23 years). TLGCX (2.32) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). TLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TLGCX: GFAFX (250) vs TLGCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. TLGCX (-7.98). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. TLGCX (-11.78).
| GFAFX | TLGCX | GFAFX / TLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.19 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.32 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.043 | 10.578 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 327M | 107,951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | -7.98 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | 14.67 | 291% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | -11.78 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.25 | 46.66 | 228% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers