Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TRLGX
GFAFX vs TRLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TRLGX
GFAFX vs TRLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TRLGX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and TRLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TRLGX (20.6B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TRLGX: GFAFX (0.20) vs TRLGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TRLGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs TRLGX (25 years). GFAFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than TRLGX (0.55). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRLGX (27.10). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRLGX: GFAFX (250) vs TRLGX (500000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.49 vs. TRLGX (-1.33). TRLGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.64 vs. GFAFX (16.83).
| GFAFX | TRLGX | GFAFX / TRLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.55 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.55 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.855 | 3.131 | 283% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 20.6B | 1,733% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.49 | -1.33 | -413% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.18 | 46.98 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.83 | 20.64 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.28 | 215.17 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement