Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TRLGX
GFAFX vs TRLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TRLGX
GFAFX vs TRLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TRLGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and TRLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. TRLGX (19.7B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TRLGX: GFAFX (0.20) vs TRLGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TRLGX: GFAFX (26 years) vs TRLGX (25 years). GFAFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than TRLGX (0.55). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRLGX (27.10). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRLGX: GFAFX (250) vs TRLGX (500000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. TRLGX (-7.27). TRLGX return over 5 years is better than : 16.96 vs. GFAFX (13.04).
| GFAFX | TRLGX | GFAFX / TRLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.55 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.55 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.043 | 2.530 | 357% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 19.7B | 1,792% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | -7.27 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | 41.77 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | 16.96 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.25 | 209.80 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers