Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TRSAX
GFAFX vs TRSAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TRSAX
GFAFX vs TRSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TRSAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and TRSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. TRSAX (48.7B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TRSAX: GFAFX (0.20) vs TRSAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TRSAX: GFAFX (26 years) vs TRSAX (25 years). TRSAX (0.92) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). TRSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRSAX: GFAFX (250) vs TRSAX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. TRSAX (-8.35). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. TRSAX (-8.69).
| GFAFX | TRSAX | GFAFX / TRSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.92 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.92 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.043 | 1.341 | 674% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 48.7B | 725% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | -8.35 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | 28.66 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | -8.69 | -150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.25 | 99.73 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers