Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TRSAX
GFAFX vs TRSAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TRSAX
GFAFX vs TRSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TRSAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and TRSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TRSAX (49.8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TRSAX: GFAFX (0.20) vs TRSAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TRSAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs TRSAX (24 years). TRSAX (0.92) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). TRSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRSAX: GFAFX (250) vs TRSAX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. TRSAX (4.73). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.46 vs. TRSAX (-2.20).
| GFAFX | TRSAX | GFAFX / TRSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.92 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.92 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.330 | 3.397 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 49.8B | 725% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 4.73 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.13 | 37.15 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.46 | -2.20 | -702% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.04 | 118.31 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers