Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TWCCX
GFAFX vs TWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TWCCX
GFAFX vs TWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TWCCX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and TWCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TWCCX (26.8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TWCCX: GFAFX (0.20) vs TWCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TWCCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs TWCCX (25 years). TWCCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCCX (15.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCCX: GFAFX (250) vs TWCCX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.49 vs. TWCCX (-3.96). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.83 vs. TWCCX (-7.68).
| GFAFX | TWCCX | GFAFX / TWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.87 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.89 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.855 | 4.714 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 26.8B | 1,332% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.49 | -3.96 | -138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.18 | 20.39 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.83 | -7.68 | -219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.28 | 105.72 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement