Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TWCCX
GFAFX vs TWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TWCCX
GFAFX vs TWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TWCCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and TWCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. TWCCX (26B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TWCCX: GFAFX (0.20) vs TWCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TWCCX: GFAFX (26 years) vs TWCCX (25 years). TWCCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCCX (15.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCCX: GFAFX (250) vs TWCCX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. TWCCX (-9.85). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. TWCCX (-11.60).
| GFAFX | TWCCX | GFAFX / TWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.87 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.87 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.043 | 3.608 | 251% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 26B | 1,358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | -9.85 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | 19.02 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | -11.60 | -112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.25 | 102.33 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers