Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TWRCX
GFAFX vs TWRCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TWRCX
GFAFX vs TWRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TWRCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and TWRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TWRCX (14.9B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TWRCX: GFAFX (0.20) vs TWRCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TWRCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs TWRCX (16 years). TWRCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). TWRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWRCX: GFAFX (250) vs TWRCX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. TWRCX (-0.80). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.46 vs. TWRCX (-0.20).
| GFAFX | TWRCX | GFAFX / TWRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.83 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.96 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.330 | 4.053 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 14.9B | 2,423% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | -0.80 | -1,068% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.13 | 20.79 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.46 | -0.20 | -7,909% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.04 | 78.65 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers