Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs UGLSX
GFAFX vs UGLSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs UGLSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$70.20
Change+$0.72 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth R6
Price$71.10
Change+$0.25 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.97B
GFAFX vs UGLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. UGLSX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and UGLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. UGLSX (1.97B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than UGLSX: GFAFX (0.35) vs UGLSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than UGLSX: GFAFX (24 years) vs UGLSX (14 years). UGLSX (0.78) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). UGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGLSX: GFAFX (250) vs UGLSX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.81 vs. UGLSX (-9.57). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 71.15 vs. UGLSX (47.79).
| GFAFX | UGLSX | GFAFX / UGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.77 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.78 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.826 | -4.618 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 275B | 1.97B | 13,959% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.81 | -9.57 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.95 | 2.87 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.15 | 47.79 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.39 | 62.61 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...