Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs UGLSX
GFAFX vs UGLSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs UGLSX
GFAFX vs UGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. UGLSX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and UGLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. UGLSX (1.2B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than UGLSX: GFAFX (0.20) vs UGLSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than UGLSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs UGLSX (15 years). UGLSX (0.78) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX (32.00) and UGLSX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGLSX: GFAFX (250) vs UGLSX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. UGLSX (-20.48). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.91 vs. UGLSX (-24.05).
| GFAFX | UGLSX | GFAFX / UGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.77 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.78 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.691 | -4.541 | -191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.2B | 30,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | -20.48 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.36 | -7.14 | -677% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.91 | -24.05 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.77 | 41.01 | 287% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers