Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs VCBCX
GFAFX vs VCBCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs VCBCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.85
Change-$0.14 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
VALIC Company I Systematic Growth
Price$20.96
Change+$0.06 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
GFAFX vs VCBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. VCBCX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and VCBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. VCBCX (1.07B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than VCBCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs VCBCX (0.08). GFAFX was incepted earlier than VCBCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs VCBCX (25 years). VCBCX (0.83) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). VCBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). VCBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: VCBCX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.84 vs. VCBCX (15.52). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.07 vs. VCBCX (-11.11).
| GFAFX | VCBCX | GFAFX / VCBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.83 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.747 | 4.842 | 367% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 1.07B | 31,314% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.08 | 372% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.84 | 15.52 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.13 | 32.61 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.07 | -11.11 | -442% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.21 | 17.86 | 572% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement