Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs VCBCX
GFAFX vs VCBCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs VCBCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.93
Change-$0.32 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.36B
VALIC Company I Systematic Growth
Price$21.03
Change-$0.17 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
GFAFX vs VCBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. VCBCX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and VCBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. VCBCX (1.09B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than VCBCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs VCBCX (0.08). GFAFX was incepted earlier than VCBCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs VCBCX (25 years). VCBCX (0.82) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). VCBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). VCBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: VCBCX (0) vs GFAFX (250). VCBCX (10.98) and GFAFX (10.60) have marching annual gain over last year. GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.72 vs. VCBCX (-15.83).
| GFAFX | VCBCX | GFAFX / VCBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.64 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.82 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.855 | 6.042 | 296% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 1.09B | 31,123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.08 | 381% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.60 | 10.98 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.30 | 53.32 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.72 | -15.83 | -251% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.72 | 18.28 | 545% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement