Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WFPDX
GFAFX vs WFPDX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WFPDX
GFAFX vs WFPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WFPDX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WFPDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WFPDX (1.38B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WFPDX: GFAFX (0.20) vs WFPDX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WFPDX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WFPDX (16 years). WFPDX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). WFPDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFPDX: GFAFX (250) vs WFPDX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. WFPDX (-8.84). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.46 vs. WFPDX (-42.77).
| GFAFX | WFPDX | GFAFX / WFPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.08 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.330 | 6.738 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.38B | 26,255% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | -8.84 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.13 | -12.63 | -357% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.46 | -42.77 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.04 | -20.39 | -554% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement