Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WFPDX
GFAFX vs WFPDX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WFPDX
GFAFX vs WFPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WFPDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and WFPDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WFPDX (1.24B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WFPDX: GFAFX (0.20) vs WFPDX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WFPDX: GFAFX (26 years) vs WFPDX (16 years). WFPDX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). WFPDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFPDX: GFAFX (250) vs WFPDX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. WFPDX (-25.55). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. WFPDX (-50.00).
| GFAFX | WFPDX | GFAFX / WFPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.08 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.043 | -0.684 | -1,323% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 1.24B | 28,491% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | -25.55 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | -8.54 | -500% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | -50.00 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.25 | -29.47 | -361% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers