Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WLGYX
GFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WLGYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.34
Change+$0.65 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.87B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund Y
Price$40.08
Change+$0.26 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.69B
GFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WLGYX commentary
Nov 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WLGYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. WLGYX (7.69B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGYX: GFAFX (0.28) vs WLGYX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WLGYX (25 years). WLGYX (0.97) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGYX (18.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WLGYX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.20 vs. WLGYX (3.46). WLGYX (32.58) and GFAFX (32.45) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFAFX | WLGYX | GFAFX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.89 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.97 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.344 | 5.585 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 7.69B | 4,227% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.20 | 3.46 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.52 | 48.94 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.45 | 32.58 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.79 | 97.54 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement