Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WLGYX
GFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WLGYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.47
Change+$0.62 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund Y
Price$40.84
Change+$0.20 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8B
GFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WLGYX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and WLGYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. WLGYX (8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGYX: GFAFX (0.29) vs WLGYX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WLGYX (25 years). WLGYX (0.99) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGYX (18.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WLGYX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.86 vs. WLGYX (9.63). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.65 vs. WLGYX (38.94).
| GFAFX | WLGYX | GFAFX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.89 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.99 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.747 | 7.060 | 251% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 8B | 4,225% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.86 | 9.63 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.00 | 53.47 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.65 | 38.94 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.19 | 111.56 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement