Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WLGYX
GFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WLGYX
GFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WLGYX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WLGYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WLGYX (6.22B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGYX: GFAFX (0.20) vs WLGYX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: GFAFX (26 years) vs WLGYX (26 years). WLGYX (0.98) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGYX (24.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WLGYX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.23 vs. WLGYX (-3.81). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.12 vs. WLGYX (7.74).
| GFAFX | WLGYX | GFAFX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.98 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.247 | 2.275 | 319% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 6.22B | 5,673% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.23 | -3.81 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.35 | 32.98 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.12 | 7.74 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.01 | 107.48 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement