Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WOFRX
GFAFX vs WOFRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WOFRX
GFAFX vs WOFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WOFRX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WOFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WOFRX (1.85B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WOFRX: GFAFX (0.20) vs WOFRX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WOFRX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WOFRX (6 years). WOFRX (0.77) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WOFRX (21.00). WOFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WOFRX (0) vs GFAFX (250). WOFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.50 vs. GFAFX (-0.57). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 10.50 vs. WOFRX (-2.20).
| GFAFX | WOFRX | GFAFX / WOFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.69 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.77 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.768 | 6.616 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 1.85B | 19,350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.57 | 1.50 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.34 | 16.56 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.50 | -2.20 | -477% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement