Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WOFRX
GFAFX vs WOFRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WOFRX
GFAFX vs WOFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WOFRX commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WOFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. WOFRX (1.92B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WOFRX: GFAFX (0.21) vs WOFRX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WOFRX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WOFRX (6 years). WOFRX (0.77) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WOFRX (21.00). WOFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WOFRX (0) vs GFAFX (250). WOFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. GFAFX (4.42). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.80 vs. WOFRX (2.23).
| GFAFX | WOFRX | GFAFX / WOFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.69 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.77 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.194 | 11.497 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 1.92B | 17,850% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.42 | 6.00 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.04 | 27.22 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.80 | 2.23 | 754% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement