Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPCSX
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.94
Change-$0.59 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$47.13
Change-$0.59 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets692.65M
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPCSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WPCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. WPCSX (693M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: GFAFX (0.28) vs WPCSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: GFAFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. WPCSX (-9.74). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.96 vs. WPCSX (1.02).
| GFAFX | WPCSX | GFAFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.75 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.75 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.157 | 3.829 | 396% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 693M | 47,619% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | -9.74 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.85 | 14.96 | 413% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 1.02 | 3,243% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.41 | 69.34 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers