Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPCSX
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.47
Change+$0.62 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$49.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets729.93M
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPCSX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. WPCSX (730M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: GFAFX (0.29) vs WPCSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: GFAFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.84 vs. WPCSX (-6.65). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.07 vs. WPCSX (12.90).
| GFAFX | WPCSX | GFAFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.75 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.75 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.747 | 6.614 | 268% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 730M | 46,301% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.84 | -6.65 | -268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.13 | 20.45 | 294% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.07 | 12.90 | 380% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.21 | 78.51 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement