Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPCSX
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.32
Change+$0.48 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$50.11
Change+$0.24 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets736.26M
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPCSX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. WPCSX (736M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: GFAFX (0.29) vs WPCSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: GFAFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.80 vs. WPCSX (-4.56). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.65 vs. WPCSX (12.88).
| GFAFX | WPCSX | GFAFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.75 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.75 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.740 | 8.507 | 232% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 736M | 46,332% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.80 | -4.56 | -325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.83 | 31.41 | 241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.65 | 12.88 | 347% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.02 | 80.17 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement