Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs WPCSX
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.87B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$46.17
Change-$0.10 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets722.35M
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPCSX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 286B vs. WPCSX (722M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: GFAFX (0.35) vs WPCSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: GFAFX (24 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: GFAFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.06 vs. WPCSX (-6.07). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.14 vs. WPCSX (21.06).
| GFAFX | WPCSX | GFAFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.75 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.75 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.562 | 0.675 | -380% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286B | 722M | 39,612% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.06 | -6.07 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.97 | 12.74 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.14 | 21.06 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.41 | 64.78 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...