Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPCSX
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPCSX
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPCSX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WPCSX (476M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: GFAFX (0.20) vs WPCSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: GFAFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. WPCSX (-12.39). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 21.64 vs. WPCSX (-22.70).
| GFAFX | WPCSX | GFAFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.470 | -6.463 | -147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 476M | 75,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.74 | -12.39 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.54 | -4.73 | -1,005% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.64 | -22.70 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.31 | 61.05 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers