Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPCSX
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPCSX
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPCSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WPCSX (422M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: GFAFX (0.20) vs WPCSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: GFAFX (26 years) vs WPCSX (13 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: GFAFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. WPCSX (-16.98). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. WPCSX (-28.48).
| GFAFX | WPCSX | GFAFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.043 | -6.736 | -134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 422M | 83,649% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | -16.98 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.74 | -8.12 | -527% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | -28.48 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.25 | 51.61 | 206% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers