Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$83.56
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$57.61
Change+$0.30 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets752.28M
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WPSGX (752M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFAFX (0.30) vs WPSGX (0.13). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs WPSGX (31 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (11.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.70 vs. WPSGX (2.95). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.82 vs. WPSGX (30.59).
| GFAFX | WPSGX | GFAFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.286 | 8.418 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 752M | 43,617% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.13 | 228% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.70 | 2.95 | 599% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.41 | 26.59 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.82 | 30.59 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.50 | 97.44 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement