Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.38
Change+$0.21 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$56.26
Change-$0.62 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets725.27M
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. WPSGX (725M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs WPSGX (0.13). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPSGX (32 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (11.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.40 vs. WPSGX (-2.53). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.23 vs. WPSGX (21.58).
| GFAFX | WPSGX | GFAFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.754 | 6.432 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 725M | 45,793% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.13 | 224% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.40 | -2.53 | -726% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.12 | 23.95 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.23 | 21.58 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.75 | 102.28 | 98% |