Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.28
Change-$0.13 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.07B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$57.71
Change-$0.20 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets736.58M
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. WPSGX (737M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs WPSGX (0.13). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPSGX (32 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (11.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.75 vs. WPSGX (-2.82). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. WPSGX (20.37).
| GFAFX | WPSGX | GFAFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.685 | 9.554 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 737M | 46,540% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.13 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.75 | -2.82 | -487% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.75 | 39.58 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.07 | 20.37 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.55 | 106.58 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement