Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.33
Change+$0.55 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$56.31
Change+$0.37 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets698.1M
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WPSGX (698M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFAFX (0.28) vs WPSGX (0.13). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPSGX (32 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (18.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. WPSGX (-8.32). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.24 vs. WPSGX (10.29).
| GFAFX | WPSGX | GFAFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.753 | 6.527 | 303% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 698M | 48,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.13 | 213% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | -8.32 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.08 | 23.03 | 300% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.24 | 10.29 | 333% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.09 | 96.56 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement