Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$77.48
Change-$0.93 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$54.21
Change-$0.94 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets737.35M
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. WPSGX (737M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFAFX (0.32) vs WPSGX (0.14). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs WPSGX (31 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (11.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.20 vs. WPSGX (-1.79). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.10 vs. WPSGX (31.53).
| GFAFX | WPSGX | GFAFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.043 | 4.332 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 737M | 42,062% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.14 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.20 | -1.79 | -402% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.37 | 26.90 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.10 | 31.53 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.97 | 92.11 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement