Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$67.15
Change+$1.46 (+2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.66B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$49.48
Change+$0.91 (+1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets662.99M
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. WPSGX (663M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFAFX (0.35) vs WPSGX (0.15). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs WPSGX (31 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (11.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.43 vs. WPSGX (-10.66). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.63 vs. WPSGX (26.29).
| GFAFX | WPSGX | GFAFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.941 | -8.116 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262B | 663M | 39,517% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.15 | 243% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.43 | -10.66 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.70 | -1.98 | -491% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.63 | 26.29 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.42 | 70.25 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...