Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.28
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$56.67
Change-$0.13 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets737.09M
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WPSGX (737M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFAFX (0.30) vs WPSGX (0.13). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs WPSGX (31 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (11.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.63 vs. WPSGX (-0.71). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.21 vs. WPSGX (24.25).
| GFAFX | WPSGX | GFAFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.262 | 7.454 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 737M | 44,640% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.13 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.63 | -0.71 | -2,074% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.59 | 12.69 | 336% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.21 | 24.25 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.27 | 93.30 | 94% |