Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Aug 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and WPSGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. WPSGX (466M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFAFX (0.21) vs WPSGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPSGX (32 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSGX (18.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.26 vs. WPSGX (-8.76). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.70 vs. WPSGX (-16.66).
| GFAFX | WPSGX | GFAFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.173 | -0.329 | -3,096% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 466M | 73,391% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.26 | -8.76 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.56 | 2.96 | 1,541% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.70 | -16.66 | -100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.56 | 83.64 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers