Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WPSGX (467M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFAFX (0.20) vs WPSGX (0.04). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPSGX (32 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSGX (18.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.22 vs. WPSGX (-12.76). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.06 vs. WPSGX (-18.42).
| GFAFX | WPSGX | GFAFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.395 | -6.011 | -156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 467M | 77,302% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.04 | 567% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.22 | -12.76 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.78 | -0.72 | -6,316% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.06 | -18.42 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.92 | 85.86 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement