Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Jul 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WPSGX (453M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFAFX (0.20) vs WPSGX (0.04). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPSGX (32 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSGX (18.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.59 vs. WPSGX (-12.35). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.94 vs. WPSGX (-18.68).
| GFAFX | WPSGX | GFAFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | -5.296 | -101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 453M | 78,808% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.04 | 573% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.59 | -12.35 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.18 | -2.64 | -1,409% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.94 | -18.68 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.71 | 77.69 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement