Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSZX
GFAFX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$83.08
Change+$0.72 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.41B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$56.22
Change+$0.38 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets724.89M
GFAFX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSZX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 322B vs. WPSZX (725M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSZX: GFAFX (0.30) vs WPSZX (0.15). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: GFAFX (24 years) vs WPSZX (11 years). WPSZX (0.72) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (11.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: GFAFX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.70 vs. WPSZX (1.29). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.67 vs. WPSZX (22.62).
| GFAFX | WPSZX | GFAFX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.72 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.72 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.636 | 5.279 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 322B | 725M | 44,414% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.15 | 203% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.70 | 1.29 | 1,601% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.95 | 14.55 | 316% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.67 | 22.62 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.42 | 91.91 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement