Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSZX
GFAFX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSZX
GFAFX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSZX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WPSZX (466M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSZX: GFAFX (0.20) vs WPSZX (0.03). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). WPSZX (0.74) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSZX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: GFAFX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. WPSZX (-10.58). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. WPSZX (-17.87).
| GFAFX | WPSZX | GFAFX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.73 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.74 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | -4.102 | -174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 466M | 76,609% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.03 | 601% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -10.58 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.15 | -0.03 | -119,536% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | -17.87 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.45 | 83.16 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement