Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSZX
GFAFX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSZX
GFAFX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSZX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WPSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WPSZX (471M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSZX: GFAFX (0.20) vs WPSZX (0.03). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). WPSZX (0.74) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSZX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: GFAFX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. WPSZX (-9.12). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.91 vs. WPSZX (-15.15).
| GFAFX | WPSZX | GFAFX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.73 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.74 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.691 | -5.334 | -163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 471M | 76,645% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.03 | 594% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | -9.12 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.36 | 2.83 | 1,708% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.91 | -15.15 | -125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.77 | 93.09 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement