GFF vs MDU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFF is a Hold and MDU is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GFF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MDU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
| GFF | MDU | GFF / MDU | |
| Capitalization | 3.63B | 5.14B | 71% |
| EBITDA | 270M | 868M | 31% |
| Gain YTD | 25.339 | 75.257 | 34% |
| P/E Ratio | 53.09 | 10.78 | 492% |
| Revenue | 2.68B | 4.66B | 58% |
| Total Cash | 111M | 48.9M | 227% |
| Total Debt | 1.63B | 2.47B | 66% |
GFF | MDU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GFF's Valuation (76) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as MDU (84) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to MDU’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as MDU (9) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to MDU’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's SMR Rating (14) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDU (58) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDU’s over the last 12 months.
MDU's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as GFF (42) in the Building Products industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew similarly to GFF’s over the last 12 months.
MDU's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (97) in the Building Products industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.
| GFF | MDU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 74% | 23 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 61% | 9 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 53% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PSQ | 36.36 | 0.16 | +0.44% |
| ProShares Short QQQ | |||
| UDIV | 46.92 | -0.16 | -0.33% |
| Franklin US Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | |||
| ILCG | 93.18 | -0.42 | -0.44% |
| iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | |||
| FDWM | 23.72 | -0.35 | -1.45% |
| Fidelity Women's Leadership ETF | |||
| FBL | 37.14 | -0.58 | -1.54% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | |||
GFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFF has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFF jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.