Advertisement
GFF vs MDU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFF is a StrongBuy and MDU is a StrongBuy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MDU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
| GFF | MDU | GFF / MDU | |
| Capitalization | 3.63B | 5.14B | 71% |
| EBITDA | 270M | 868M | 31% |
| Gain YTD | 0.515 | -9.084 | -6% |
| P/E Ratio | 53.09 | 10.78 | 492% |
| Revenue | 2.68B | 4.66B | 58% |
| Total Cash | 111M | 48.9M | 227% |
| Total Debt | 1.63B | 2.47B | 66% |
GFF | MDU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDU's Valuation (38) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as GFF (70) in the Building Products industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew similarly to GFF’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as MDU (13) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to MDU’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's SMR Rating (12) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDU (72) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDU’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as MDU (57) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to MDU’s over the last 12 months.
MDU's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (66) in the Building Products industry. This means that MDU’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.
| GFF | MDU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 42% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 18 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 40% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BLOK | 54.10 | 0.35 | +0.65% |
| Amplify Transformational Data Shrg ETF | |||
| FDAT | 20.99 | -0.03 | -0.16% |
| Tactical Advantage ETF | |||
| FXY | 63.41 | -0.20 | -0.31% |
| Invesco CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen | |||
| SDVY | 34.84 | -0.26 | -0.74% |
| First Trust SMID Cp Rising Div Achv ETF | |||
| AESR | 18.64 | -0.16 | -0.84% |
| Anfield US Equity Sector Rotation ETF | |||
GFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFF has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFF jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
MDU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDU has been loosely correlated with MATW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDU jumps, then MATW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDU | 100% | -2.24% | ||
| MATW - MDU | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| TRC - MDU | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| NWPX - MDU | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| CODI - MDU | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.64% | ||
| MLI - MDU | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
More | ||||