Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs HGOCX
GFFFX vs HGOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs HGOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$77.56
Change-$0.26 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.91B
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$58.14
Change-$0.18 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.68B
GFFFX vs HGOCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. HGOCX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and HGOCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. HGOCX (5.68B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than HGOCX: GFFFX (0.56) vs HGOCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than HGOCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs HGOCX (23 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: GFFFX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). HGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.73 vs. GFFFX (8.88). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.49 vs. HGOCX (-34.32).
| GFFFX | HGOCX | GFFFX / HGOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.86 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.86 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | -1.253 | -393% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 5.68B | 5,389% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 13.73 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.51 | 75.87 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.49 | -34.32 | -133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.82 | -50.79 | -149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement