Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs HGOCX
GFFFX vs HGOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs HGOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$80.87
Change+$0.84 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.68B
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$60.61
Change+$0.77 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.81B
GFFFX vs HGOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. HGOCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and HGOCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 314B vs. HGOCX (5.82B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than HGOCX: GFFFX (0.56) vs HGOCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than HGOCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs HGOCX (23 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: GFFFX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). HGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. GFFFX (10.25). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.72 vs. HGOCX (-33.42).
| GFFFX | HGOCX | GFFFX / HGOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.86 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.86 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.033 | 1.321 | 684% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 314B | 5.82B | 5,400% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.25 | 12.06 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.70 | 91.06 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.72 | -33.42 | -164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.70 | -49.18 | -172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement