Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs HGOCX
GFFFX vs HGOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs HGOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$83.59
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.04B
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$63.25
Change-$0.44 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.54B
GFFFX vs HGOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. HGOCX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and HGOCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 326B vs. HGOCX (6.54B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than HGOCX: GFFFX (0.52) vs HGOCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than HGOCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs HGOCX (23 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: GFFFX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). HGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.91 vs. GFFFX (14.31). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.52 vs. HGOCX (-37.19).
| GFFFX | HGOCX | GFFFX / HGOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.86 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.86 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.701 | 7.839 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326B | 6.54B | 4,982% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.31 | 23.91 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.14 | 91.61 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.52 | -37.19 | -125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.02 | -47.90 | -180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement