Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs HGOCX
GFFFX vs HGOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs HGOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$88.16
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$66.69
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.9B
GFFFX vs HGOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. HGOCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and HGOCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. HGOCX (6.9B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than HGOCX: GFFFX (0.51) vs HGOCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than HGOCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs HGOCX (24 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: GFFFX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). HGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 408.06 vs. GFFFX (17.86). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.78 vs. HGOCX (-36.35).
| GFFFX | HGOCX | GFFFX / HGOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.86 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.86 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.862 | 13.038 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 6.9B | 4,927% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.86 | 408.06 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.15 | 112.88 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.78 | -36.35 | -137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.69 | -42.13 | -253% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement