Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs KLCSX
GFFFX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs KLCSX
GFFFX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. KLCSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and KLCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. KLCSX (1.17B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: GFFFX (0.42) vs KLCSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: GFFFX (18 years) vs KLCSX (12 years). KLCSX (0.88) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: KLCSX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.22 vs. KLCSX (3.00). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.41 vs. KLCSX (-45.75).
| GFFFX | KLCSX | GFFFX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.78 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.88 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.536 | 16.152 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 1.17B | 28,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.22 | 3.00 | 507% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.61 | -10.75 | -508% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.41 | -45.75 | -58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.48 | 3.43 | 3,370% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement