Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs KLCSX
GFFFX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs KLCSX
GFFFX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. KLCSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and KLCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. KLCSX (1.14B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: GFFFX (0.42) vs KLCSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: GFFFX (18 years) vs KLCSX (13 years). KLCSX (0.88) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: KLCSX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.56 vs. KLCSX (-3.64). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.07 vs. KLCSX (-50.44).
| GFFFX | KLCSX | GFFFX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.78 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.88 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.265 | 14.111 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 1.14B | 31,316% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.56 | -3.64 | -125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.38 | -16.76 | -241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.07 | -50.44 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.90 | 1.19 | 8,821% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement