Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWZMX
GFFFX vs NWZMX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWZMX
GFFFX vs NWZMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWZMX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and NWZMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NWZMX (209M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: GFFFX (0.42) vs NWZMX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWZMX: GFFFX (18 years) vs NWZMX (9 years). NWZMX (0.92) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWZMX (11.29). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: GFFFX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.34 vs. NWZMX (-10.71). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.35 vs. NWZMX (2.93).
| GFFFX | NWZMX | GFFFX / NWZMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.82 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.92 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.237 | -0.349 | -2,648% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 209M | 168,900% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.34 | -10.71 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.00 | 28.04 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.35 | 2.93 | 489% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers