Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWZMX
GFFFX vs NWZMX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWZMX
GFFFX vs NWZMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWZMX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and NWZMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. NWZMX (227M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: GFFFX (0.42) vs NWZMX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWZMX: GFFFX (18 years) vs NWZMX (9 years). NWZMX (0.92) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWZMX (11.29). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: GFFFX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.22 vs. NWZMX (6.45). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.41 vs. NWZMX (15.35).
| GFFFX | NWZMX | GFFFX / NWZMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.82 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.92 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.536 | 4.434 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 227M | 148,899% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.22 | 6.45 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.61 | 39.83 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.41 | 15.35 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers