Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWZMX
GFFFX vs NWZMX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWZMX
GFFFX vs NWZMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWZMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and NWZMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NWZMX (216M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: GFFFX (0.42) vs NWZMX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWZMX: GFFFX (18 years) vs NWZMX (9 years). NWZMX (0.92) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWZMX (11.29). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: GFFFX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.56 vs. NWZMX (-4.84). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.07 vs. NWZMX (3.81).
| GFFFX | NWZMX | GFFFX / NWZMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.82 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.92 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.265 | -0.997 | -729% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 216M | 165,278% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.56 | -4.84 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.38 | 24.65 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.07 | 3.81 | 448% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement