Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PGWCX
GFFFX vs PGWCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PGWCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$88.10
Change+$0.62 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$37.57
Change+$0.26 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
GFFFX vs PGWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PGWCX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and PGWCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. PGWCX (1.76B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: GFFFX (0.51) vs PGWCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PGWCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PGWCX (42 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: GFFFX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.20 vs. PGWCX (10.91). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.95 vs. PGWCX (-6.89).
| GFFFX | PGWCX | GFFFX / PGWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.72 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.72 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.945 | 15.190 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 1.76B | 19,237% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.20 | 10.91 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.88 | 62.43 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.95 | -6.89 | -682% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.10 | 20.71 | 508% |