Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PGWCX
GFFFX vs PGWCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PGWCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$89.02
Change+$0.56 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.93B
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$38.82
Change+$0.12 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
GFFFX vs PGWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PGWCX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and PGWCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. PGWCX (1.82B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: GFFFX (0.49) vs PGWCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PGWCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PGWCX (42 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (20.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: GFFFX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.50 vs. PGWCX (6.09). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.45 vs. PGWCX (-9.90).
| GFFFX | PGWCX | GFFFX / PGWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.72 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.72 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.022 | 19.481 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 1.82B | 18,551% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.50 | 6.09 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.00 | 74.25 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.45 | -9.90 | -358% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.92 | 17.49 | 549% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement