Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PGWCX
GFFFX vs PGWCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PGWCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$89.06
Change+$0.66 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$38.36
Change+$0.20 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
GFFFX vs PGWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PGWCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and PGWCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. PGWCX (1.81B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: GFFFX (0.50) vs PGWCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PGWCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PGWCX (42 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: GFFFX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.05 vs. PGWCX (10.03). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.53 vs. PGWCX (-8.99).
| GFFFX | PGWCX | GFFFX / PGWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.72 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.72 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.076 | 17.814 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 1.81B | 18,882% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.05 | 10.03 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.98 | 76.50 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.53 | -8.99 | -484% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.13 | 22.50 | 476% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement