Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PGWCX
GFFFX vs PGWCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PGWCX
GFFFX vs PGWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PGWCX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and PGWCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. PGWCX (1.93B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: GFFFX (0.42) vs PGWCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PGWCX: GFFFX (18 years) vs PGWCX (42 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PGWCX (20.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: GFFFX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. PGWCX (-3.77). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.57 vs. PGWCX (-22.74).
| GFFFX | PGWCX | GFFFX / PGWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.72 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.72 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.137 | 0.944 | 968% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.93B | 18,714% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | -3.77 | -170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.06 | 34.58 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.57 | -22.74 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.05 | 14.80 | 757% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement