Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PGWCX
GFFFX vs PGWCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PGWCX
GFFFX vs PGWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PGWCX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and PGWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. PGWCX (1.92B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: GFFFX (0.42) vs PGWCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PGWCX: GFFFX (18 years) vs PGWCX (42 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PGWCX (20.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: GFFFX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.80 vs. PGWCX (1.28). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.44 vs. PGWCX (-18.79).
| GFFFX | PGWCX | GFFFX / PGWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.72 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.72 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.703 | 0.738 | 909% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.92B | 18,773% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.80 | 1.28 | 690% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.85 | 35.96 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.44 | -18.79 | -103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.39 | 16.88 | 660% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers