Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs SGRHX
GFFFX vs SGRHX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs SGRHX
GFFFX vs SGRHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. SGRHX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and SGRHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SGRHX (3.09B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than SGRHX: GFFFX (0.42) vs SGRHX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than SGRHX: GFFFX (18 years) vs SGRHX (11 years). SGRHX (0.76) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). SGRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). SGRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: SGRHX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.80 vs. SGRHX (-5.62). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.44 vs. SGRHX (-27.46).
| GFFFX | SGRHX | GFFFX / SGRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.70 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.76 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.703 | 4.503 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 3.09B | 11,702% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.80 | -5.62 | -157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.85 | 9.13 | 502% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.44 | -27.46 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.39 | -2.14 | -5,202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement