Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WLCGX
GFFFX vs WLCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WLCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Wilshire Large Company Growth Instl
Price$62.71
Change+$0.42 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.64M
GFFFX vs WLCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WLCGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and WLCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. WLCGX (276M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WLCGX: GFFFX (0.49) vs WLCGX (0.03). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WLCGX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WLCGX (29 years). WLCGX (1.00) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). WLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLCGX: GFFFX (250) vs WLCGX (250000). WLCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.90 vs. GFFFX (7.18). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.29 vs. WLCGX (10.94).
| GFFFX | WLCGX | GFFFX / WLCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.00 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.00 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.017 | 18.715 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 276M | 118,478% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.03 | 1,658% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.18 | 8.90 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.61 | 68.87 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.29 | 10.94 | 323% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.20 | 43.20 | 211% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement