Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WLCGX
GFFFX vs WLCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WLCGX
GFFFX vs WLCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WLCGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and WLCGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. WLCGX (280M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WLCGX: GFFFX (0.44) vs WLCGX (0.11). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WLCGX: GFFFX (18 years) vs WLCGX (30 years). WLCGX (1.00) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). WLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLCGX: GFFFX (250) vs WLCGX (250000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.82 vs. WLCGX (-2.89). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.39 vs. WLCGX (-1.64).
| GFFFX | WLCGX | GFFFX / WLCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.00 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.00 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.574 | 6.945 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 280M | 122,143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.11 | 404% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.82 | -2.89 | -201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.36 | 50.89 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.39 | -1.64 | -1,118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.75 | 38.24 | 271% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers