Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WLCGX
GFFFX vs WLCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WLCGX
GFFFX vs WLCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WLCGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and WLCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WLCGX (279M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WLCGX: GFFFX (0.42) vs WLCGX (0.10). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WLCGX: GFFFX (18 years) vs WLCGX (30 years). WLCGX (1.00) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). WLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLCGX: GFFFX (250) vs WLCGX (250000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.37 vs. WLCGX (6.76). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.30 vs. WLCGX (3.06).
| GFFFX | WLCGX | GFFFX / WLCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.00 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.00 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.825 | 7.730 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 279M | 129,391% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.10 | 407% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.37 | 6.76 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.68 | 52.96 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.30 | 3.06 | 664% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.45 | 51.41 | 234% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement