Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFGF vs RECS
GFGF vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts GFGF vs RECS
GFGF vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFGF vs. RECS commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFGF is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.7B vs. GFGF (36M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than GFGF: RECS (5.583) vs GFGF (-1.691). GFGF was incepted earlier than RECS: GFGF (5 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than GFGF (0.66). GFGF has a higher turnover RECS (32.00) vs RECS (32.00).
| GFGF | RECS | GFGF / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -1.691 | 5.583 | -30% |
| Net Assets | 36M | 5.7B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.15 | 440% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 32.00 | 122% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 0.74 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GFGF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GFGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFGF has been closely correlated with INTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFGF jumps, then INTU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GFGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| INTU - GFGF | 69% Closely correlated | -3.46% | ||
| CPRT - GFGF | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| LRCX - GFGF | 62% Loosely correlated | +5.27% | ||
| ADBE - GFGF | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| CRM - GFGF | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -4.75% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -3.18% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More | ||||