GFR
Price
$5.10
Change
+$0.10 (+2.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
358.29M
MTDR
Price
$50.16
Change
+$0.27 (+0.54%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
6.24B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFR vs MTDR

Header iconGFR vs MTDR Comparison
Open Charts GFR vs MTDRBanner chart's image
Greenfire Resources
Price$5.10
Change+$0.10 (+2.00%)
Volume$93.45K
Capitalization358.29M
Matador Resources
Price$50.16
Change+$0.27 (+0.54%)
Volume$1.12M
Capitalization6.24B
GFR vs MTDR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFR vs. MTDR commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFR is a Buy and MTDR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GFR: $5.10 vs. MTDR: $50.16)
Brand notoriety: GFR and MTDR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFR: 228% vs. MTDR: 67%
Market capitalization -- GFR: $358.29M vs. MTDR: $6.24B
GFR [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $358.29M. MTDR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $6.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $122.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTDR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GFR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTDR is a better buy in the long-term than GFR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTDR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTDR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFR is a better buy in the short-term than MTDR.

Price Growth

GFR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +13.84% price change this week, while MTDR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +8.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTDR is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.56% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTDR($6.25B) has a higher market cap than GFR($358M). MTDR has higher P/E ratio than GFR: MTDR (7.37) vs GFR (2.48). MTDR YTD gains are higher at: -9.052 vs. GFR (-27.762). MTDR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.56B vs. GFR (261M). GFR has more cash in the bank: 70M vs. MTDR (10.5M). GFR has less debt than MTDR: GFR (323M) vs MTDR (3.38B). MTDR has higher revenues than GFR: MTDR (3.77B) vs GFR (731M).
GFRMTDRGFR / MTDR
Capitalization358M6.25B6%
EBITDA261M2.56B10%
Gain YTD-27.762-9.052307%
P/E Ratio2.487.3734%
Revenue731M3.77B19%
Total Cash70M10.5M667%
Total Debt323M3.38B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTDR: Fundamental Ratings
MTDR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFRMTDR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SATLF9.88N/A
N/A
Zozo Inc.
LYPHF0.27N/A
N/A
Luye Pharma Group LTD.
COSAF0.16N/A
-0.76%
COSA RES CORP.
ESLOY153.83-1.39
-0.90%
EssilorLuxottica
GSHRF0.27-0.01
-4.86%
Goldshore Resources Inc.

GFR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFR has been loosely correlated with FANG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFR jumps, then FANG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFR
1D Price
Change %
GFR100%
+2.00%
FANG - GFR
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
KRP - GFR
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
PR - GFR
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
DVN - GFR
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
OVV - GFR
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
More

MTDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTDR has been closely correlated with PR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTDR jumps, then PR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTDR
1D Price
Change %
MTDR100%
+0.54%
PR - MTDR
93%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
SM - MTDR
92%
Closely correlated
+2.57%
OVV - MTDR
91%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
CHRD - MTDR
90%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
FANG - MTDR
90%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
More