Advertisement
GGAL vs SUPV
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) vs. Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both GGAL and SUPV are Argentine financial holding companies offering banking, insurance, and related services in a challenging macroeconomic environment.
- GGAL has demonstrated relatively stronger recent performance and larger market capitalization compared with SUPV.
- SUPV has experienced sharper declines over the past year, reflecting greater sensitivity to local economic pressures.
- Sector exposure for both centers on regional banking in Argentina, with growth drivers tied to lending, deposits, and currency stability.
- Market sentiment remains influenced by Argentine economic indicators, with GGAL showing more consistent positioning in recent market activity.
- Relative performance highlights trade-offs in scale, volatility, and resilience between the two stocks.
Introduction
Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) and Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) are two prominent Argentine financial services companies whose American depositary shares trade on U.S. exchanges. This comparison examines their business models, recent price behavior, and relative positioning within the regional banking sector. Investors and traders focused on emerging-market financials, currency-linked equities, or diversification beyond developed markets may find the analysis relevant for understanding performance contrasts in the current environment.
GGAL Overview and Recent Performance
Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. operates as a financial services holding company providing banking, insurance, credit cards, and investment products primarily in Argentina. Its segments include banking through Banco Galicia, the Naranja X credit card business, and other financial services. In recent weeks, GGAL has shown relatively resilient price behavior amid broader market volatility, with year-to-date returns outperforming its peer despite sector headwinds. Recent market activity reflects ongoing sensitivity to Argentine economic conditions, including interest rate dynamics and currency movements, which have influenced investor sentiment toward larger regional banks. The stock maintains a larger market capitalization, supporting a perception of greater scale and stability in comparative assessments.
SUPV Overview and Recent Performance
Grupo Supervielle S.A. functions as a diversified financial services holding company offering personal and corporate banking, insurance, asset management, and treasury services in Argentina. Its operations span multiple segments focused on lending, deposits, and fee-based activities. In recent weeks, SUPV has recorded more pronounced price declines, with year-to-date and one-year performance lagging behind the broader sector and its peer. Recent market activity highlights greater exposure to local economic fluctuations, contributing to heightened volatility and shifts in sentiment. The smaller market capitalization underscores differences in scale relative to larger competitors in the Argentine financial landscape.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to current market conditions. Only the most suitable and statistically robust bots earn placement in the trending section, which highlights ranges of returns, win rates, and drawdowns across different trading styles. All AI trading bots feature distinct approaches, risk parameters, and ticker universes. This resource provides traders with data-driven options for automated strategies. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both companies operate in Argentina’s regional banking sector, with business models centered on deposit gathering, lending, and ancillary services such as insurance and asset management. GGAL benefits from greater scale through its established banking franchise and credit card operations, supporting broader revenue diversification. SUPV maintains a more focused regional presence, which can amplify both upside and downside from localized economic catalysts. Recent momentum favors GGAL on a relative basis, with less severe drawdowns over the trailing twelve months. Risk factors for both include Argentine macroeconomic variables such as inflation and currency controls, though SUPV has exhibited higher price volatility. Market sentiment reflects these differences, with GGAL positioned as the more stable large-cap option and SUPV offering potentially higher beta to sector recovery scenarios.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, relative stability, and positioning within the Argentine financial sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to GGAL over SUPV. This assessment reflects GGAL’s larger scale and comparatively resilient recent performance amid shared sector challenges. Outcomes remain subject to evolving macroeconomic conditions in Argentina.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGAL is a Hold and SUPV is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GGAL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSUPV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GGAL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- SUPV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GGAL’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUPV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GGAL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SUPV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GGAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.68% price change this week, while SUPV (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
GGAL is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.
SUPV is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.69% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| GGAL | SUPV | GGAL / SUPV | |
| Capitalization | 8.05B | 867M | 929% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.415 | -20.051 | 32% |
| P/E Ratio | 128.93 | 37.62 | 343% |
| Revenue | 8.62T | 790B | 1,091% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 369B | - |
GGAL | SUPV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 44 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 2 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SUPV's Valuation (80) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as GGAL (88) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SUPV’s stock grew similarly to GGAL’s over the last 12 months.
GGAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUPV (67) in the Major Banks industry. This means that GGAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUPV’s over the last 12 months.
GGAL's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SUPV (1) in the Major Banks industry. This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to SUPV’s over the last 12 months.
GGAL's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SUPV (52) in the Major Banks industry. This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to SUPV’s over the last 12 months.
GGAL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SUPV (7) in the Major Banks industry. This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to SUPV’s over the last 12 months.
| GGAL | SUPV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 26 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 83% |
Advertisement
GGAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGAL has been closely correlated with BMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGAL jumps, then BMA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GGAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGAL | 100% | -1.67% | ||
| BMA - GGAL | 95% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| SUPV - GGAL | 93% Closely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| BBAR - GGAL | 93% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| USB - GGAL | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| BSBR - GGAL | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.06% | ||
More | ||||
SUPV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUPV has been closely correlated with BBAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SUPV jumps, then BBAR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUPV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUPV | 100% | -1.46% | ||
| BBAR - SUPV | 93% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| GGAL - SUPV | 93% Closely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| BMA - SUPV | 92% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| BSAC - SUPV | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| BSBR - SUPV | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
More | ||||