Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGFSX vs RPFGX
GGFSX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts GGFSX vs RPFGX
GGFSX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGFSX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGFSX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. GGFSX (144M). GGFSX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: GGFSX (1.63) vs RPFGX (1.37). GGFSX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: GGFSX (8 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). GGFSX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RPFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. GGFSX (9.00). GGFSX initial investment is less costly to investors than RPFGX (5%) vs RPFGX (5%). GGFSX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GGFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.00 vs. RPFGX (12.33). GGFSX return over 5 years is better than : 121.46 vs. RPFGX (51.18).
| GGFSX | RPFGX | GGFSX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.94 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.94 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.567 | -2.558 | -257% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 121% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 144M | 1.13B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.37 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.00 | 12.33 | 243% |
| Returns for 3 years | 114.31 | 74.29 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 121.46 | 51.18 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 131.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement