Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGGCX vs NPFCX
GGGCX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts GGGCX vs NPFCX
GGGCX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGGCX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGCX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. GGGCX (189M). GGGCX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: GGGCX (1.07) vs NPFCX (0.33). GGGCX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: GGGCX (26 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). GGGCX (2.32) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. GGGCX (15.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGGCX: NPFCX (250) vs GGGCX (1000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.16 vs. GGGCX (-6.97). GGGCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.28 vs. NPFCX (5.21).
| GGGCX | NPFCX | GGGCX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.47 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.32 | 1.47 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.757 | 2.656 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.33 | 326% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.97 | 2.16 | -322% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.28 | 27.59 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.28 | 5.21 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.33 | 90.85 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement