Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRUX vs RGAGX
GGRUX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts GGRUX vs RGAGX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth R6
Price$12.32
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.57
Change+$0.46 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
GGRUX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRUX vs. RGAGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRUX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. GGRUX (172M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than GGRUX: RGAGX (0.56) vs GGRUX (0.00). GGRUX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: GGRUX (10 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). GGRUX (0.95) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). GGRUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRUX: RGAGX (250) vs GGRUX (5000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. GGRUX (-11.62). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.91 vs. GGRUX (-4.48).
| GGRUX | RGAGX | GGRUX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.30 | 247% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.30 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.605 | 16.123 | -53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.62 | 7.34 | -158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.62 | 64.06 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.48 | 35.91 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.58 | 92.33 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement