Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGSOX vs SCWFX
GGSOX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GGSOX vs SCWFX
GGSOX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGSOX vs. SCWFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGSOX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. GGSOX (77.5M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than GGSOX: SCWFX (0.56) vs GGSOX (0.00). GGSOX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GGSOX (11 years) vs SCWFX (26 years). GGSOX (1.37) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GGSOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGSOX: SCWFX (250) vs GGSOX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.85 vs. GGSOX (3.64). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -9.66 vs. GGSOX (-35.01).
| GGSOX | SCWFX | GGSOX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.07 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.07 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.426 | 12.243 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77.5M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.64 | 8.85 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.85 | 37.17 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.01 | -9.66 | 362% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.46 | 81.80 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement