Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGSYX vs SCWFX
GGSYX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GGSYX vs SCWFX
GGSYX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGSYX vs. SCWFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGSYX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. GGSYX (77.5M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than GGSYX: SCWFX (0.56) vs GGSYX (0.12). GGSYX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GGSYX (11 years) vs SCWFX (26 years). GGSYX (1.11) and SCWFX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . GGSYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGSYX: SCWFX (250) vs GGSYX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.85 vs. GGSYX (3.89). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -9.66 vs. GGSYX (-34.08).
| GGSYX | SCWFX | GGSYX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.07 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.07 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.599 | 12.243 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77.5M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.56 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.89 | 8.85 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.78 | 37.17 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.08 | -9.66 | 353% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.54 | 81.80 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement