GH
Price
$161.99
Change
+$9.64 (+6.33%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
21.74B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PSNL
Price
$12.66
Change
+$0.38 (+3.09%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.35B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GH vs PSNL

GH vs PSNL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Guardant Health (GH) vs. Personalis (PSNL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Guardant Health (GH) generated full-year 2025 revenue of approximately $982 million, reflecting 33% year-over-year growth, driven by accelerating oncology test volumes and the rapid commercial launch of its Shield blood-based colorectal cancer screening test.
  • Personalis (PSNL) posted 2025 revenue of roughly $69.6 million, a decline of nearly 18% from the prior year, though clinical test volumes surged nearly 400% as its NeXT Personal minimal residual disease (MRD) platform gained physician adoption.
  • Both companies operate in the precision oncology diagnostics space, yet GH benefits from a diversified, multi-product revenue base approaching $1 billion annually, while PSNL is earlier in its commercial evolution with a concentrated MRD (minimal residual disease) strategy.
  • Guardant Health ended 2025 with approximately $1.3 billion in cash and marketable securities; Personalis held roughly $240 million — a meaningful disparity in financial firepower for commercial expansion and R&D (research and development).
  • GH carries a beta of 1.59 versus PSNL's 2.24, indicating Personalis exhibits substantially higher volatility relative to the broader market.
  • Analyst consensus rates GH a "Strong Buy" with a price target implying double-digit upside, while PSNL holds a "Buy" consensus with a more modest implied return.

Introduction

The precision oncology sector has drawn intense investor attention as liquid biopsy and genomic testing technologies reshape how cancer is detected, monitored, and treated. GH (Guardant Health) and PSNL (Personalis) represent two distinct profiles within this rapidly evolving industry. Guardant Health has matured into a commercial powerhouse with a broad portfolio spanning therapy selection, recurrence monitoring, and early cancer screening. Personalis, by contrast, is a smaller, more focused player betting heavily on ultrasensitive MRD testing. This stock comparison examines how these two companies differ in scale, growth trajectory, risk profile, and market positioning — offering traders and long-term investors a clear, data-driven view of their relative performance and prospects.

GH Overview and Recent Performance

Guardant Health is a leading precision oncology company headquartered in Palo Alto, California, offering blood- and tissue-based cancer tests across the full continuum of care. Its flagship products include the Guardant360 liquid biopsy platform for therapy selection, Guardant Reveal for MRD detection and monitoring, and Shield — an FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration)-approved blood test for colorectal cancer screening. The company also maintains a robust biopharma and data services segment, partnering with major pharmaceutical firms for companion diagnostic development and real-world data analytics.

In recent quarters, GH has delivered accelerating financial momentum. Full-year 2025 revenue reached approximately $982 million, a 33% increase over 2024, with fourth-quarter revenue alone climbing 39% year-over-year to roughly $281 million. Oncology test volumes grew 34% for the full year, while Shield screening volumes expanded dramatically from a near-zero base in early 2024 to approximately 87,000 tests in 2025. Non-GAAP (non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) gross margins held strong at around 66%, and the company has guided for 2026 revenue between $1.25 billion and $1.28 billion, implying continued 27–30% growth. Recent strategic developments include a collaboration with Merck for companion diagnostics, Shield's inclusion in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, partnerships with Quest Diagnostics and PathGroup to broaden screening access, and the acquisition of MetaSight Diagnostics. With a market capitalization near $19.5 billion and approximately $1.3 billion in cash reserves, GH has considerable resources to fund its expanding commercial footprint.

PSNL Overview and Recent Performance

Personalis, based in Fremont, California, specializes in advanced genomics for precision oncology, with a primary focus on its NeXT Personal platform — an ultrasensitive, tumor-informed liquid biopsy test for detecting MRD, monitoring therapy response, and surveilling for cancer recurrence. The company also offers ImmunoID NeXT, a tissue-based tumor profiling service used by biopharma partners for drug development and clinical trials. Personalis operates under a concentrated "Win-in-MRD" strategy, directing most of its resources toward establishing NeXT Personal as a standard of care in solid tumor monitoring.

PSNL's recent financial picture reflects a company in transition. Full-year 2025 revenue declined roughly 18% to $69.6 million, pressured by the wind-down of legacy customer relationships — notably with Natera — and lower pharma testing volumes. However, clinical test adoption has been a bright spot: the company delivered approximately 16,233 clinical tests in 2025, representing nearly 400% growth over the prior year, with sequential quarter-over-quarter volume acceleration. A pivotal milestone arrived in late 2025 when Personalis secured Medicare coverage for breast cancer surveillance using NeXT Personal, followed by lung cancer coverage in early 2026. The company ended 2025 with around $240 million in cash after raising approximately $109 million through an ATM (At-The-Market) equity offering. For 2026, management has guided for total revenue of $78–$80 million and clinical revenue of $10–$11 million — a projected fivefold increase — while acknowledging that gross margins will remain compressed (15–20%) as the company invests heavily ahead of full reimbursement. With a market capitalization near $1.26 billion and a beta of 2.24, PSNL exhibits significantly more price volatility than its larger peer.

Trending AI Robots

In a market environment where speed, pattern recognition, and data-driven discipline increasingly separate successful traders from the rest, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated window into the platform's most capable AI-powered trading agents. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots covering thousands of tickers, yet only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn placement in this featured section. These bots employ distinct trading styles — including swing trading, trend following, and intraday price-action strategies — across timeframes ranging from 5 minutes to several days. Performance metrics such as annualized returns, win rates, and profit factors vary widely by strategy, with top-performing bots historically delivering annualized returns exceeding 70% and win rates above 65%. Each AI robot is powered by Tickeron's proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs), which continuously retrain on real-time market data. For traders seeking an analytical edge in comparing stocks like GH and PSNL, exploring the Trending AI Robots section can reveal which bots are currently trading these or related tickers with statistically backed conviction.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The contrast between GH and PSNL is defined primarily by scale, maturity, and diversification. Guardant Health operates a multi-pronged revenue engine: oncology testing (therapy selection and MRD monitoring), screening (Shield), and biopharma data services. This breadth partially insulates the company from weakness in any single segment and creates multiple avenues for growth. Personalis, on the other hand, is almost entirely dependent on the success of NeXT Personal in the MRD market — a high-upside but concentrated bet.

From a growth driver perspective, GH is capitalizing on the rapid adoption of Shield, which has been described as one of the most successful diagnostic launches in recent history, alongside steady volume increases in its core oncology business. PSNL's growth narrative hinges on converting clinical test volume acceleration into reimbursed revenue now that Medicare coverage for breast and lung cancer surveillance has been secured.

Risk profiles diverge meaningfully. GH, while still unprofitable on a GAAP basis, has a clear path toward narrowing losses, with free cash flow burn improving year-over-year and the core oncology business expected to reach free cash flow breakeven. PSNL carries higher execution risk: gross margins are under pressure, cash usage is projected at approximately $100 million in 2026, and the company must demonstrate it can translate clinical adoption into sustainable reimbursement revenue before its capital runway narrows. PSNL's beta of 2.24 versus GH's 1.59 further underscores the higher volatility and sharper price swings investors have experienced in Personalis shares.

Sector exposure is similar — both are precision oncology diagnostics companies — but market sentiment differs. GH benefits from broad institutional coverage (25 analysts, "Strong Buy" consensus) and a demonstrated capacity to raise capital on favorable terms, including a $350 million convertible note offering and a $300 million equity raise in late 2025. PSNL has 6 analysts covering it with a "Buy" consensus, and notable institutional backing from Merck (which holds roughly 15.8% of shares) and ARK Invest, though the company relied on ATM equity sales at a weighted-average price of $8.43 per share to bolster its balance sheet.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market data, trend consistency, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely favor GH in the current environment. Guardant Health exhibits stronger and more predictable revenue growth, a diversified product portfolio that reduces single-indication risk, higher gross margins, a substantially larger cash reserve, and a lower beta — all factors that algorithmic models typically associate with greater trend stability and lower downside volatility. Personalis, while demonstrating impressive clinical volume momentum and securing pivotal Medicare coverage wins, remains in an earlier and more uncertain phase of its commercial journey, with compressed margins and higher cash-burn intensity relative to its revenue base. That said, probabilistic models would not dismiss PSNL outright; rather, they would likely assign it a higher risk-reward profile suited to strategies with greater volatility tolerance. For traders seeking exposure to precision oncology with comparatively lower beta and stronger revenue visibility, GH appears better positioned within the current market regime.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GH vs. PSNL commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GH is a Buy and PSNL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (GH: $161.99 vs. PSNL: $12.66)
Brand notoriety: GH: Notable vs. PSNL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GH: 114% vs. PSNL: 51%
Market capitalization -- GH: $21.74B vs. PSNL: $1.35B
GH [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $21.74B. PSNL’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $1.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $17.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePSNL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PSNL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSNL is a better buy in the long-term than GH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSNL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PSNL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PSNL is a better buy in the short-term than GH.

Price Growth

GH (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +9.95% price change this week, while PSNL (@Medical Specialties) price change was +7.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

GH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

PSNL is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+0.40% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GH($21.7B) has a higher market cap than PSNL($1.35B). PSNL (59.045) and GH (58.596) have similar YTD gains . PSNL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -85.47M vs. GH (-411.19M). GH has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. PSNL (233M). PSNL has less debt than GH: PSNL (38.8M) vs GH (1.7B). GH has higher revenues than PSNL: GH (1.18B) vs PSNL (64.5M).
GHPSNLGH / PSNL
Capitalization21.7B1.35B1,606%
EBITDA-411.19M-85.47M481%
Gain YTD58.59659.04599%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.18B64.5M1,834%
Total Cash1.05B233M452%
Total Debt1.7B38.8M4,374%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GH vs PSNL: Fundamental Ratings
GH
PSNL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8268
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSNL's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as GH (65) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that PSNL’s stock grew similarly to GH’s over the last 12 months.

GH's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as PSNL (100) in the null industry. This means that GH’s stock grew similarly to PSNL’s over the last 12 months.

PSNL's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as GH (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that PSNL’s stock grew similarly to GH’s over the last 12 months.

GH's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as PSNL (35) in the null industry. This means that GH’s stock grew similarly to PSNL’s over the last 12 months.

GH's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as PSNL (100) in the null industry. This means that GH’s stock grew similarly to PSNL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GHPSNL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PSNL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLFFX26.440.22
+0.84%
Lone Peak Value Investor
PRPCX5.410.03
+0.56%
PGIM Jennison Energy Infrastructure C
TBLIX37.580.14
+0.37%
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced I
HLAL69.900.08
+0.12%
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
HAPS37.30N/A
N/A
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Sm CapETF

GH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GH has been loosely correlated with NTRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GH jumps, then NTRA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GH
1D Price
Change %
GH100%
+6.33%
NTRA - GH
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
PSNL - GH
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.09%
RGEN - GH
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.80%
ADPT - GH
41%
Loosely correlated
-6.66%
GKOS - GH
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
More

PSNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSNL has been loosely correlated with GRAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSNL jumps, then GRAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSNL
1D Price
Change %
PSNL100%
+3.09%
GRAL - PSNL
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.63%
ADPT - PSNL
51%
Loosely correlated
-6.66%
RVTY - PSNL
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
TWST - PSNL
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
NTRA - PSNL
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
More