GHC
Price
$772.45
Change
+$24.70 (+3.30%)
Updated
Sep 13 closing price
44 days until earnings call
MSA
Price
$178.72
Change
+$2.29 (+1.30%)
Updated
Sep 16, 10:54 AM (EDT)
37 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GHC vs MSA

Header iconGHC vs MSA Comparison
Open Charts GHC vs MSABanner chart's image
Graham Holdings
Price$772.45
Change+$24.70 (+3.30%)
Volume$14.26K
CapitalizationN/A
Mine Safety
Price$178.72
Change+$2.29 (+1.30%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
GHC vs MSA Comparison Chart
Loading...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
GHC vs. MSA commentary
Sep 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GHC is a Buy and MSA is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2024
Stock price -- (GHC: $772.45 vs. MSA: $176.43)
Brand notoriety: GHC and MSA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GHC: 101% vs. MSA: 143%
Market capitalization -- GHC: $3.42B vs. MSA: $7.51B
GHC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $3.42B. MSA’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $7.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $4.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GHC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMSA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MSA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the long-term than MSA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSA is a better buy in the short-term than GHC.

Price Growth

GHC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +5.49% price change this week, while MSA (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +5.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +19.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

GHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2024.

MSA is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+19.02% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSA($7.51B) has a higher market cap than GHC($3.42B). MSA has higher P/E ratio than GHC: MSA (129.00) vs GHC (17.25). GHC YTD gains are higher at: 11.675 vs. MSA (5.367). GHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 665M vs. MSA (314M). GHC has more cash in the bank: 867M vs. MSA (146M). MSA has less debt than GHC: MSA (646M) vs GHC (1.25B). GHC has higher revenues than MSA: GHC (4.42B) vs MSA (1.79B).
GHCMSAGHC / MSA
Capitalization3.42B7.51B46%
EBITDA665M314M212%
Gain YTD11.6755.367218%
P/E Ratio17.25129.0013%
Revenue4.42B1.79B247%
Total Cash867M146M594%
Total Debt1.25B646M194%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GHC vs MSA: Fundamental Ratings
GHC
MSA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8026
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7322
SMR RATING
1..100
8635
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4557
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GHC's Valuation (29) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSA (91) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSA’s over the last 12 months.

MSA's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHC (73) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.

MSA's SMR Rating (35) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHC (86) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MSA (57) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to MSA’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSA (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew significantly faster than MSA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GHCMSA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSME34.990.78
+2.28%
Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF
DARP29.900.21
+0.72%
Grizzle Growth ETF
TYD29.170.15
+0.52%
Direxion Daily 7-10 Yr Trs Bull 3X ETF
PPH97.520.22
+0.23%
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
ESGD82.020.16
+0.20%
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF

GHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with BCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then BCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHC
1D Price
Change %
GHC100%
+3.30%
BCO - GHC
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.10%
RGP - GHC
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
UNF - GHC
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
MMS - GHC
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
CASS - GHC
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.97%
More