Ad is loading...
GIBAX vs PDBZX
GIBAX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts GIBAX vs PDBZX
Guggenheim Total Return Bond A
Price$23.59
Change+$0.12 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.15B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.89
Change+$0.06 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.53B
GIBAX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GIBAX vs. PDBZX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIBAX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48.5B vs. GIBAX (27.1B). PDBZX (4.64) and GIBAX (4.45) have matching dividends . GIBAX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: GIBAX (13 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). GIBAX (0.88) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). PDBZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. GIBAX (70.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GIBAX: PDBZX (0) vs GIBAX (2500). GIBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. PDBZX (6.77). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.95 vs. GIBAX (-0.60).
| GIBAX | PDBZX | GIBAX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.49 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.50 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.299 | 1.225 | 106% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.1B | 48.5B | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.45 | 4.64 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | 6.77 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.52 | 4.74 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.60 | 0.95 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.77 | 15.72 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...