GIFLF vs GRFS
To understand the difference between Grifols SA (GIFLF) vs. Grifols SA - ADR - Level III (GRFS) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR - Level III
ADR - Level III - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars. Foreign companies issuing Level-III ADRs are mandated to fulfill all registration and reporting requirements imposed by the SEC. The security is allowed to be listed on a major U.S. stock exchange such as the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market. Unlike other types of ADR, Level-III ADRs can raise capital through a public offering within the United State.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GIFLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGRFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GIFLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GRFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GIFLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GIFLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GRFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GIFLF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +4.37% price change this week, while GRFS (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was +11.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.91%.
Reported Earning Dates
GRFS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-2.43% weekly)The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
| GIFLF | GRFS | GIFLF / GRFS | |
| Capitalization | 8.79B | 5.48B | 160% |
| EBITDA | 726M | 640M | 113% |
| Gain YTD | -9.048 | -30.363 | 30% |
| P/E Ratio | 62.50 | 68.68 | 91% |
| Revenue | 6.46B | 6.54B | 99% |
| Total Cash | 557M | 544M | 102% |
| Total Debt | 10.9B | 11.1B | 98% |
GIFLF | GRFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GRFS's Valuation (8) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as GIFLF (18) in the null industry. This means that GRFS’s stock grew similarly to GIFLF’s over the last 12 months.
GRFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as GIFLF (100) in the null industry. This means that GRFS’s stock grew similarly to GIFLF’s over the last 12 months.
GRFS's SMR Rating (86) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as GIFLF (86) in the null industry. This means that GRFS’s stock grew similarly to GIFLF’s over the last 12 months.
GRFS's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as GIFLF (77) in the null industry. This means that GRFS’s stock grew similarly to GIFLF’s over the last 12 months.
GIFLF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as GRFS (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that GIFLF’s stock grew similarly to GRFS’s over the last 12 months.
| GIFLF | GRFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ARCM | 100.50 | N/A | N/A |
| Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF | |||
| XMAR | 36.21 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Mar | |||
| PZA | 23.82 | -0.12 | -0.50% |
| Invesco National AMT-Free Muni Bd ETF | |||
| LITP | 6.98 | -0.10 | -1.41% |
| Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | |||
| URTY | 57.36 | -2.07 | -3.48% |
| ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | |||
GIFLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GIFLF and GIFOF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GIFLF and GIFOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GIFLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIFLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GIFOF - GIFLF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GIKLY - GIFLF | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
| GRFS - GIFLF | 22% Poorly correlated | +5.64% | ||
| AMRN - GIFLF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| BAYZF - GIFLF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||
GRFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRFS has been closely correlated with GIKLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GRFS jumps, then GIKLY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRFS | 100% | +5.64% | ||
| GIKLY - GRFS | 68% Closely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| GIFOF - GRFS | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PFE - GRFS | 28% Poorly correlated | +4.67% | ||
| GIFLF - GRFS | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AMGN - GRFS | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||