Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GIMCX vs PACAX
GIMCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts GIMCX vs PACAX
GIMCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GIMCX vs. PACAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIMCX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 838M vs. GIMCX (233M). GIMCX pays higher dividends than PACAX: GIMCX (3.94) vs PACAX (2.74). GIMCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: GIMCX (22 years) vs PACAX (33 years). PACAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than GIMCX (0.56). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. GIMCX (32.77). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GIMCX: PACAX (0) vs GIMCX (1000000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.14 vs. GIMCX (6.48). GIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.61 vs. PACAX (7.41).
| GIMCX | PACAX | GIMCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.96 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.96 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.700 | 2.935 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233M | 838M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.94 | 2.74 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | 7.14 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.32 | 27.76 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.61 | 7.41 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.25 | 36.08 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement