Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GIMCX vs PACAX
GIMCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts GIMCX vs PACAX
GIMCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GIMCX vs. PACAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIMCX is a Buy and PACAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 844M vs. GIMCX (234M). GIMCX pays higher dividends than PACAX: GIMCX (3.91) vs PACAX (3.03). GIMCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: GIMCX (22 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than GIMCX (0.56). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. GIMCX (32.77). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GIMCX: PACAX (0) vs GIMCX (1000000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.86 vs. GIMCX (7.64). GIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.84 vs. PACAX (9.15).
| GIMCX | PACAX | GIMCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.96 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.96 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.399 | 3.962 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 844M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.91 | 3.03 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.64 | 8.86 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.76 | 28.88 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.84 | 9.15 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.16 | 37.52 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement