Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GIMCX vs PACAX
GIMCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts GIMCX vs PACAX
GIMCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GIMCX vs. PACAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIMCX is a StrongBuy and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 838M vs. GIMCX (237M). GIMCX pays higher dividends than PACAX: GIMCX (3.82) vs PACAX (3.05). GIMCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: GIMCX (21 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than GIMCX (0.56). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. GIMCX (32.77). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GIMCX: PACAX (0) vs GIMCX (1000000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.90 vs. GIMCX (9.21). GIMCX (11.14) and PACAX (10.94) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GIMCX | PACAX | GIMCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.96 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.96 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.263 | 3.693 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 237M | 838M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.82 | 3.05 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.21 | 10.90 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.16 | 30.38 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.14 | 10.94 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.61 | 39.28 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement