Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GINNX vs RNPAX
GINNX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts GINNX vs RNPAX
GINNX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GINNX vs. RNPAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GINNX is a Hold and RNPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. GINNX (196M). RNPAX pays higher dividends than GINNX: RNPAX (0.36) vs GINNX (0.00). GINNX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: GINNX (11 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than GINNX (1.08). RNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. GINNX (15.67). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GINNX: RNPAX (250) vs GINNX (100000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.70 vs. GINNX (-1.82). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.55 vs. GINNX (-11.89).
| GINNX | RNPAX | GINNX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.49 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.49 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.581 | 6.007 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 196M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | 2.70 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.79 | 35.23 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.89 | 5.55 | -214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.12 | 97.01 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement