Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GIRPX vs RNWAX
GIRPX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts GIRPX vs RNWAX
GIRPX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GIRPX vs. RNWAX commentary
Aug 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIRPX is a Hold and RNWAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. GIRPX (3.73B). GIRPX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: GIRPX (1.80) vs RNWAX (0.50). GIRPX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: GIRPX (16 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than GIRPX (1.23). GIRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). GIRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWAX: GIRPX (0) vs RNWAX (250). GIRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.14 vs. RNWAX (18.19). GIRPX return over 5 years is better than : 27.09 vs. RNWAX (13.29).
| GIRPX | RNWAX | GIRPX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.66 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.66 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.471 | 15.086 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.73B | 88.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.50 | 362% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.14 | 18.19 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.62 | 49.43 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.09 | 13.29 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.73 | 98.48 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement