Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GIRPX vs RNWFX
GIRPX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GIRPX vs RNWFX
GIRPX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GIRPX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIRPX is a Hold and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. GIRPX (3.73B). GIRPX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: GIRPX (1.80) vs RNWFX (1.22). GIRPX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GIRPX (16 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). GIRPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). GIRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). GIRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: GIRPX (0) vs RNWFX (250). GIRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.14 vs. RNWFX (19.71). GIRPX return over 5 years is better than : 27.09 vs. RNWFX (18.95).
| GIRPX | RNWFX | GIRPX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.62 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.62 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.471 | 15.843 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.73B | 88.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.22 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.14 | 19.71 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.62 | 54.81 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.09 | 18.95 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.73 | 110.63 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers