GIS
Price
$36.20
Change
+$0.19 (+0.53%)
Updated
Aug 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
19.21B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SJM
Price
$119.25
Change
+$1.75 (+1.49%)
Updated
Aug 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.56B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GIS vs SJM

GIS vs SJM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? General Mills (GIS) vs. J.M. Smucker (SJM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • General Mills (GIS) is navigating a transitional fiscal 2026, with organic sales declining and earnings under significant pressure from reinvestment initiatives and portfolio reshaping, including yogurt divestitures.
  • J.M. Smucker (SJM) has demonstrated stronger recent momentum, with comparable sales growth accelerating into the mid-single digits, despite lingering headwinds from its Sweet Baked Snacks segment and a major goodwill impairment charge recorded in mid-2025.
  • Over the trailing 12-month period, SJM has materially outperformed GIS, posting positive returns versus a double-digit decline for General Mills, reflecting divergent market sentiment.
  • Both companies operate in the packaged foods industry and face common challenges including input cost inflation, tariff uncertainty, and shifting consumer behavior, yet their strategic responses and portfolio compositions have produced notably different near-term trajectories.
  • Valuation multiples have compressed for both stocks, but consensus analyst ratings and earnings revision trends currently lean more favorably toward SJM.

Introduction

General Mills and J.M. Smucker are two of the most recognized names in the North American packaged foods industry, each commanding a multi-billion-dollar portfolio of household brands. General Mills produces staples such as Cheerios, Pillsbury, Nature Valley, and Blue Buffalo pet food, while J.M. Smucker owns Folgers coffee, Jif peanut butter, Uncrustables sandwiches, and Milk-Bone dog treats. Despite operating in the same sector, these two companies have charted markedly different courses in recent quarters. This stock comparison examines how GIS and SJM stack up across dimensions of business performance, strategic positioning, market sentiment, and risk, offering traders and investors a structured framework for evaluating relative opportunity in the current environment.

GIS Overview and Recent Performance

General Mills, headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, generated approximately $19.5 billion in net sales in its most recent fiscal year. The company's Accelerate strategy prioritizes brand building, innovation, scale, and portfolio reshaping — actions that have recently included the divestiture of its North American yogurt business and the acquisition of Whitebridge Pet Brands. In recent weeks, GIS shares have hovered near the lower end of their 52-week range, reflecting sustained investor caution. Over the trailing one-year period, the stock has declined roughly 29%, considerably underperforming both the broader market and its consumer staples peers.

The primary weight on sentiment has been a series of earnings reports showing persistent organic sales declines and margin compression. In its most recently reported quarter, organic net sales fell 3%, while adjusted earnings per share dropped approximately 37% year over year. Management has characterized fiscal 2026 as a transition year centered on restoring volume-driven growth through its "remarkability" framework — encompassing product innovation, packaging, brand communication, and consumer value investments. The company has reaffirmed its full-year outlook but continues to face headwinds from retailer inventory reductions, softness in snacking categories, and elevated input costs. On the positive side, market share trends have improved in Pet, Foodservice, and International segments, and the Blue Buffalo launch into fresh pet food represents a notable growth catalyst.

SJM Overview and Recent Performance

J.M. Smucker, based in Orrville, Ohio, has undergone its own portfolio transformation. The acquisition of Hostess Brands in late 2023 expanded its presence in sweet baked snacks, while subsequent divestitures — including the Voortman business and certain Sweet Baked Snacks value brands — have aimed to sharpen the company's focus on core growth platforms. In recent months, SJM stock has exhibited notably stronger price performance than GIS, posting a roughly 22% gain over the past 90 days and a positive return of approximately 9% over the trailing one-year period. The shares have recovered significantly from the sharp sell-off experienced in June 2025, when the company disclosed an $867 million goodwill impairment charge tied to the underperformance of its Sweet Baked Snacks segment.

Operationally, Smucker's recent quarterly results have shown improving top-line momentum, with comparable net sales rising 5% to 8% in recent periods, driven heavily by higher net pricing in coffee. Key growth platforms — Uncrustables, Café Bustelo, and Meow Mix — continue to gain traction. However, earnings have faced pressure from higher commodity costs and tariffs, with adjusted earnings per share declining double digits year over year in recent quarters. The company updated its full-year fiscal 2026 outlook, projecting net sales growth of 3.5% to 4.5% and adjusted EPS in the range of $8.75 to $9.25. While segment-level performance remains uneven — particularly the drag from Sweet Baked Snacks — the overall revenue trajectory has provided a more constructive narrative than what General Mills has offered in the same period.

Trending AI Robots

In a market environment where packaged food stocks face crosscurrents from inflation, tariffs, and evolving consumer preferences, traders are increasingly turning to AI-driven tools to navigate complexity. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of its top-performing AI trading bots — drawn from a universe of hundreds of available virtual agents that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Only those bots best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this section. These AI robots employ diverse trading styles, strategies, and timeframes, from 5-minute and 15-minute high-frequency models to longer-duration swing trading systems. Performance metrics among featured bots have ranged from double-digit annualized returns to figures exceeding 100%, with win rates observed above 65% and profit factors surpassing 4.0 in some strategies. Each bot operates with distinct parameters, trading a specific set of tickers, and is powered by Tickeron's proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs) — AI architectures designed to continuously learn from price action, volume, and volatility data. To explore which AI robots are currently leading, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both GIS and SJM operate in the packaged foods space, several structural differences define their relative positioning. General Mills derives significant scale from its North America Retail segment — spanning cereal, snacks, and meals — and has built a sizable pet food business through Blue Buffalo. Smucker, by contrast, is heavily anchored in coffee, which serves as both a revenue driver and a source of commodity-linked volatility. Coffee pricing has been a tailwind for Smucker's top line in recent quarters, but volume declines in the category suggest consumers may be pushing back against higher prices.

On growth drivers, Smucker's Uncrustables franchise continues to deliver momentum, while General Mills is betting on innovation and fresh pet food to reignite volume growth. In terms of risk factors, both companies face tariff exposure and input cost inflation, but Smucker carries the added burden of rehabilitating its Sweet Baked Snacks segment following the Hostess-related impairment. General Mills' risks center on execution of its reinvestment strategy and whether volume trends can inflect positively before margin pressure becomes more acute. From a market sentiment perspective, SJM has benefited from upward earnings revision momentum and a more favorable relative performance trend, while GIS has faced downward estimate revisions and carries a lower consensus rating. Valuation multiples for both stocks sit below historical medians, with forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios in the 10–12x range — though Smucker trades at a modest discount to General Mills on this metric.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, sales momentum, relative price performance, and earnings revision direction, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor SJM over GIS in the current market environment. Smucker's comparable sales growth trajectory, positive price momentum over multiple timeframes, and stabilizing outlook provide a more constructive pattern for trend-following models. General Mills, while trading at a compressed valuation that may appeal to deep-value investors, continues to exhibit declining earnings estimates, weaker price performance relative to both its peer and the broader market, and a more uncertain path to returning to organic growth. The AI verdict reflects a probabilistic assessment of near-term relative strength rather than a judgment on long-term intrinsic value, and traders should consider that market conditions and model inputs evolve continuously.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GIS vs. SJM commentary
Aug 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIS is a Hold and SJM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 05, 2026
Stock price -- (GIS: $36.00 vs. SJM: $117.50)
Brand notoriety: GIS: Notable vs. SJM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GIS: 81% vs. SJM: 79%
Market capitalization -- GIS: $19.21B vs. SJM: $12.56B
GIS [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $19.21B. SJM’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $12.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $255.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $3.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GIS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSJM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GIS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SJM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SJM is a better buy in the long-term than GIS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GIS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SJM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GIS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SJM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SJM is a better buy in the short-term than GIS.

Price Growth

GIS (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -1.67% price change this week, while SJM (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -2.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

GIS is expected to report earnings on Sep 23, 2026.

SJM is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.92% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GIS($19.2B) has a higher market cap than SJM($12.6B). SJM has higher P/E ratio than GIS: SJM (22.05) vs GIS (9.23). SJM YTD gains are higher at: 22.680 vs. GIS (-18.783). GIS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.53B vs. SJM (876M). GIS has more cash in the bank: 454M vs. SJM (58.6M). SJM has less debt than GIS: SJM (7.09B) vs GIS (13.9B). GIS has higher revenues than SJM: GIS (18.4B) vs SJM (9.05B).
GISSJMGIS / SJM
Capitalization19.2B12.6B152%
EBITDA1.53B876M175%
Gain YTD-18.78322.680-83%
P/E Ratio9.2322.0542%
Revenue18.4B9.05B203%
Total Cash454M58.6M775%
Total Debt13.9B7.09B196%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GIS vs SJM: Fundamental Ratings
GIS
SJM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6825
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
9292
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6021
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8123
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GIS's Valuation (8) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as SJM (18) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that GIS’s stock grew similarly to SJM’s over the last 12 months.

SJM's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as GIS (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that SJM’s stock grew similarly to GIS’s over the last 12 months.

SJM's SMR Rating (92) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as GIS (92) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that SJM’s stock grew similarly to GIS’s over the last 12 months.

SJM's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GIS (60) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that SJM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GIS’s over the last 12 months.

SJM's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GIS (81) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that SJM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GIS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GISSJM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GIS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SJM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSTE2.180.09
+4.31%
Caesarstone Ltd
SLI2.070.03
+1.47%
Standard Lithium Ltd
MKC51.520.62
+1.22%
McCormick & Company
ATHM23.250.03
+0.13%
Autohome
PWCM1.63-0.49
-23.11%
PowerCompute Inc

GIS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GIS has been closely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GIS jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GIS
1D Price
Change %
GIS100%
+0.70%
CAG - GIS
77%
Closely correlated
+2.76%
CPB - GIS
75%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
KHC - GIS
69%
Closely correlated
+2.21%
MDLZ - GIS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
HSY - GIS
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
More

SJM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SJM has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SJM jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SJM
1D Price
Change %
SJM100%
-1.48%
GIS - SJM
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
CAG - SJM
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.76%
KHC - SJM
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
TR - SJM
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
MKC - SJM
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
More