Advertisement
GL vs NTRS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GL is a Hold and NTRS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTRS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NTRS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTRS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NTRS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -0.57% price change this week, while NTRS (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.21%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
GL is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
NTRS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (-0.09% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
@Investment Managers (+0.28% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| GL | NTRS | GL / NTRS | |
| Capitalization | 10.7B | 18B | 59% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.524 | 9.830 | 77% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.33 | 17.41 | 65% |
| Revenue | 5.45B | 6.77B | 80% |
| Total Cash | 18.1B | 4.79B | 378% |
| Total Debt | 2.12B | 13.4B | 16% |
GL | NTRS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 25 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GL's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as NTRS (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to NTRS’s over the last 12 months.
NTRS's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as GL (54) in the null industry. This means that NTRS’s stock grew similarly to GL’s over the last 12 months.
NTRS's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for GL (91) in the null industry. This means that NTRS’s stock grew significantly faster than GL’s over the last 12 months.
NTRS's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as GL (47) in the null industry. This means that NTRS’s stock grew similarly to GL’s over the last 12 months.
GL's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NTRS (92) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that GL’s stock grew significantly faster than NTRS’s over the last 12 months.
| GL | NTRS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 56% | 8 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 43% | 16 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CXE | 3.53 | 0.03 | +0.80% |
| MFS High Income Municipal Trust | |||
| BAR | 33.38 | N/A | N/A |
| GraniteShares Gold Trust | |||
| USHY | 36.97 | -0.05 | -0.14% |
| iShares Broad USD High Yield Corp Bd ETF | |||
| QVMM | 28.02 | -0.34 | -1.21% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Mlt-fctr ETF | |||
| RFEM | 69.32 | -0.91 | -1.30% |
| First Trust RiverFront Dyn Em Mkts ETF | |||
NTRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTRS has been closely correlated with STT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTRS jumps, then STT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTRS | 100% | +2.93% | ||
| STT - NTRS | 82% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| AMP - NTRS | 76% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| PFG - NTRS | 75% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| BN - NTRS | 73% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| TROW - NTRS | 73% Closely correlated | +1.78% | ||
More | ||||