Advertisement
AMP vs NTRS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ameriprise Financial (AMP) vs. Northern Trust (NTRS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Ameriprise Financial (AMP) trades at a more attractive trailing P/E ratio of 12.6 compared to Northern Trust's (NTRS) 18.2, indicating potential value.
- NTRS has outperformed year-to-date with a 17% gain versus AMP's 7%, driven by market rallies.
- Both firms report robust assets under management (AUM), with AMP at $1.69 trillion and NTRS at $1.8 trillion, benefiting from recent equity market strength.
- AMP shows superior profitability, with return on equity (ROE) of 60.5% far exceeding NTRS's 13.5%.
- Upcoming quarterly earnings reports represent key catalysts, with analysts anticipating growth for both stocks amid positive sentiment.
- Financial sector exposure makes both relevant for traders navigating interest rate dynamics and volatility.
Introduction
Ameriprise Financial (AMP) and Northern Trust (NTRS) are prominent players in the financial services sector, focusing on wealth management, asset management, and related services. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors and traders seeking exposure to firms that capitalize on rising AUM and fee income during periods of market appreciation and shifting monetary policies. Both stocks offer insights into relative performance amid broader economic trends, helping portfolio managers evaluate value, momentum, and risk in the competitive landscape of diversified financials. With upcoming earnings and analyst attention, understanding their positioning aids informed decision-making in today's environment.
AMP Overview and Recent Performance
Ameriprise Financial (AMP), headquartered in Minneapolis, provides diversified financial services through segments including Advice & Wealth Management, Asset Management, and Retirement & Protection Solutions. The company manages approximately $1.69 trillion in AUM and advisory assets, serving retail and institutional clients with planning, brokerage, insurance, and investment products under brands like Columbia Threadneedle Investments. In recent market activity, AMP stock has risen about 7% year-to-date, trading near $457 with a market cap of $42 billion. Performance has been supported by equity market gains boosting client assets to record levels and strong segment profitability, evidenced by Q4 2025 revenue of $4.92 billion. Sentiment reflects mixed analyst views ahead of Q1 earnings, with focus on adjusted operating earnings growth and AUM expansion amid favorable conditions.
NTRS Overview and Recent Performance
Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS), based in Chicago, delivers asset servicing, wealth management, and banking solutions, with $18.7 trillion in assets under custody/administration and $1.8 trillion in AUM as of late 2025. Its segments emphasize custody, fund administration, and high-net-worth services for institutions and individuals. Recently, NTRS shares have advanced around 17% year-to-date to about $159, with a $30 billion market cap, outperforming peers on fee income surges from market rallies. Recent weeks show upward momentum, influenced by profit beats in prior quarters, rising asset values, and anticipation for Q1 results projecting EPS growth. Positive developments include onboarding new funds, enhancing operational scale.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from over 350 available, each trading thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto with diverse strategies like swing trading, sector rotation, and leveraged plays. These bots employ AI/ML for technical and fundamental analysis, real-time signals, and risk controls such as take-profit/stop-loss corridors, targeting current market themes like semiconductors, gold miners, industrials, and small caps. Performance highlights include annualized returns ranging from 15% to 168%, win rates of 54% to 88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios of 2 to 22. Suited to volatile conditions, they offer timeframes from minutes to weeks. Explore these bots to align automated strategies with your trading style.
Head-to-Head Comparison
AMP and NTRS operate in overlapping financial services but diverge in emphasis: AMP leans retail wealth advice and annuities, while NTRS prioritizes institutional asset servicing and custody. Growth drivers include AUM expansion for both, though NTRS's massive AUC scale provides fee stability. Recent momentum favors NTRS with superior short-term gains, contrasting AMP's steadier profile. Valuation tilts to AMP on lower P/E and price-to-book (6.3 vs. 2.4), with higher ROE signaling efficiency. Risks involve net interest income (NII) sensitivity to rates for NTRS and market volatility impacting AMP's advisory fees. Market sentiment is constructive pre-earnings, with NTRS eyed for custody tailwinds.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI analysis currently leans toward AMP, citing its trend consistency, elevated profitability metrics like 60% ROE, and compelling valuation relative to peers. While NTRS exhibits stronger recent momentum, AMP's positioning offers higher probability of sustained outperformance amid favorable AUM trends and earnings catalysts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMP is a StrongBuy and NTRS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTRS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- AMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NTRS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTRS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NTRS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMP (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.98% price change this week, while NTRS (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.30%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMP is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
NTRS is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+1.75% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| AMP | NTRS | AMP / NTRS | |
| Capitalization | 41.3B | 32.3B | 128% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.745 | 28.949 | -20% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.44 | 18.26 | 63% |
| Revenue | 18.9B | 8.35B | 226% |
| Total Cash | 45.8B | 5.82B | 787% |
| Total Debt | 5.81B | 14.1B | 41% |
AMP | NTRS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 11 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 48 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTRS's Valuation (72) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMP (79) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that NTRS’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.
AMP's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NTRS (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to NTRS’s over the last 12 months.
NTRS's SMR Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMP (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that NTRS’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.
NTRS's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMP (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that NTRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMP’s over the last 12 months.
NTRS's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMP (83) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that NTRS’s stock grew significantly faster than AMP’s over the last 12 months.
| AMP | NTRS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 57% | 7 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
AMP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMP has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMP jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
NTRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTRS has been closely correlated with STT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTRS jumps, then STT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTRS | 100% | +2.10% | ||
| STT - NTRS | 72% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| RJF - NTRS | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| AMP - NTRS | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| BLK - NTRS | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| CG - NTRS | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.69% | ||
More | ||||