GLAD
Price
$24.91
Change
+$0.34 (+1.38%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
466.85M
PFLT
Price
$9.71
Change
+$0.23 (+2.43%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
690.23M
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GLAD vs PFLT

Header iconGLAD vs PFLT Comparison
Open Charts GLAD vs PFLTBanner chart's image
Gladstone Capital
Price$24.91
Change+$0.34 (+1.38%)
Volume$107.65K
Capitalization466.85M
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
Price$9.71
Change+$0.23 (+2.43%)
Volume$1.05M
Capitalization690.23M
GLAD vs PFLT Comparison Chart
Loading...
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLAD vs. PFLT commentary
Apr 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLAD is a Hold and PFLT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2025
Stock price -- (GLAD: $24.92 vs. PFLT: $9.71)
Brand notoriety: GLAD and PFLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLAD: 91% vs. PFLT: 60%
Market capitalization -- GLAD: $466.85M vs. PFLT: $690.23M
GLAD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $466.85M. PFLT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $690.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLAD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFLT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GLAD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFLT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLAD is a better buy in the long-term than PFLT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLAD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFLT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLAD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PFLT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFLT is a better buy in the short-term than GLAD.

Price Growth

GLAD (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.99% price change this week, while PFLT (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLAD is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2024.

PFLT is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.92% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFLT($690M) has a higher market cap than GLAD($467M). PFLT has higher P/E ratio than GLAD: PFLT (9.41) vs GLAD (7.34). PFLT YTD gains are higher at: -7.662 vs. GLAD (-10.878). PFLT has more cash in the bank: 15.1M vs. GLAD (9.33M). GLAD has less debt than PFLT: GLAD (338M) vs PFLT (671M). GLAD has higher revenues than PFLT: GLAD (74M) vs PFLT (65.9M).
GLADPFLTGLAD / PFLT
Capitalization467M690M68%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.878-7.662142%
P/E Ratio7.349.4178%
Revenue74M65.9M112%
Total Cash9.33M15.1M62%
Total Debt338M671M50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLAD vs PFLT: Fundamental Ratings
GLAD
PFLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1467
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
812
SMR RATING
1..100
1412
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5676
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7674
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFLT's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLAD (38). This means that PFLT’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

GLAD's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as PFLT (12). This means that GLAD’s stock grew similarly to PFLT’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAD (14). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

GLAD's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as PFLT (76). This means that GLAD’s stock grew similarly to PFLT’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAD (76). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLADPFLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STPCX9.96N/A
N/A
Saratoga Technology & Comm C
WFEFX13.36N/A
N/A
Allspring International Equity C
HGIRX48.73N/A
N/A
Hartford Core Equity R3
UGLSX67.64N/A
N/A
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth R6
WPSZX48.74N/A
N/A
AB Concentrated Growth Z

PFLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFLT has been closely correlated with CSWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFLT jumps, then CSWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFLT
1D Price
Change %
PFLT100%
+2.43%
CSWC - PFLT
75%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
FDUS - PFLT
75%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
NMFC - PFLT
73%
Closely correlated
+2.63%
GBDC - PFLT
71%
Closely correlated
+2.61%
BXSL - PFLT
71%
Closely correlated
+2.01%
More