PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) are two affiliated BDCs, or business development companies — regulated investment vehicles that lend to and invest in U.S. middle-market businesses. Because both are managed by PennantPark Investment Advisers, they often attract the same income-focused investor base, yet their portfolios, risk profiles, and recent stock behavior have diverged meaningfully. This stock comparison is most relevant to yield-oriented investors and traders evaluating relative performance, dividend sustainability, and market positioning within the BDC sector during a period of shifting interest-rate expectations.
PFLT, or PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, invests primarily in floating-rate, first-lien senior secured loans to middle-market companies, with roughly 99% of its debt portfolio floating rate and about 87% in first-lien positions. In recent quarters, management reset the dividend framework to a $0.08 base monthly distribution plus a variable supplemental payment, aligning payouts more closely with net investment income (NII). Portfolio credit quality has remained comparatively strong, with non-accrual investments under 1% and limited software exposure. The company continues to scale its PSSL II joint venture, and a defense-technology equity co-investment is expected to generate a sizable realization. Despite these positives, the shares have declined over the past year and trade at a notable discount to net asset value (NAV), with a dividend yield in the mid-teens.
PNNT, or PennantPark Investment Corporation, takes a broader approach across the capital structure, holding first-lien and second-lien secured debt, subordinated debt, preferred and common equity, and some government securities. In recent market activity, PNNT's stock has fallen more sharply than its sibling, and it now trades at a steep discount to book value. The portfolio shows a higher non-accrual rate and a meaningful equity component that can amplify both gains and losses. Management has kept the monthly distribution at $0.08 per share, but distribution coverage has been questioned as core NII has lagged. The higher headline yield reflects elevated investor caution about earnings quality and credit trends rather than straightforward strength.
Tickeron operates a large ecosystem of AI trading bots that collectively monitor thousands of tickers, but only a select group earns a place in the curated Trending AI Robots section. These bots vary widely by trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, and the set of securities they track, so the page highlights the strategies currently best aligned with prevailing market conditions. By browsing the list, investors can compare bots that may be actively analyzing names such as PFLT and PNNT and assess their historical statistics before committing to a strategy. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to review the current lineup.
The clearest contrast between the two names is structural. PFLT concentrates on senior, floating-rate first-lien loans, giving it lower credit risk and more direct sensitivity to short-term interest rates. PNNT allocates a substantial portion of its portfolio to subordinated debt and equity, which historically offers higher upside but greater volatility and weaker downside protection.
On credit quality, PFLT's sub-1% non-accrual rate compares favorably with PNNT's higher non-accrual level, a meaningful factor in the current environment. Relative performance has also diverged: both stocks have declined over the past year, but PNNT's drop has been considerably larger, and its price sits far below book value. Analyst sentiment mirrors this gap, with a Buy consensus on PFLT versus a Hold on PNNT. In terms of yield, PNNT's higher figure should be weighed against its thinner coverage, while PFLT's reset dividend now offers more transparent alignment with earnings.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, credit quality, dividend alignment, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor PFLT at present. The company's senior-secured, floating-rate focus, low non-accrual rate, more stable NAV, and clearer dividend coverage form a comparatively more consistent foundation than PNNT's broader, higher-beta portfolio. That said, this is a probabilistic assessment rather than a definitive forecast, and either name could outperform depending on the trajectory of interest rates, credit conditions, and middle-market deal activity in the months ahead.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The RSI Oscillator for PFLT moved out of oversold territory on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 35 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 21 of the 35 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 60%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 27, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PFLT as a result. In 34 of 75 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 45%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PFLT just turned positive on October 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where PFLT's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 25 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
PFLT moved above its 50-day moving average on November 06, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for PFLT crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 9 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.
Following a +4.68% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PFLT advanced for three days, in 144 of 336 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 43%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 30 of 57 cases where PFLT's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 53%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PFLT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 51%.
PFLT broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for PFLT entered a downward trend on November 02, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 22 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. PFLT’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 88 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.671) is normal, around the industry mean (2.412). P/E Ratio (13.490) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-2.386). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.262) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.033) settles around the average of (0.270) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (11.249) is also within normal values, averaging (15.694).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PFLT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock worse than average.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PNNT turned positive on October 29, 2026. Looking at past instances where PNNT's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 27 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 02, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PNNT as a result. In 47 of 97 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 48%.
PNNT moved above its 50-day moving average on November 05, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +0.90% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PNNT advanced for three days, in 154 of 299 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 52%.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PNNT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 52%.
PNNT broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for PNNT entered a downward trend on October 30, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 4 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. PNNT’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 88 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.510) is normal, around the industry mean (2.412). P/E Ratio (22.267) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-2.386). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.278) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.080) settles around the average of (0.270) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (10.571) is also within normal values, averaging (15.694).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PNNT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock worse than average.
PFLT | PNNT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PFLT's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as PNNT (88). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to PNNT’s over the last 12 months.
PFLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PNNT (100). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to PNNT’s over the last 12 months.
PFLT's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as PNNT (76). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to PNNT’s over the last 12 months.
PFLT's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as PNNT (60). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to PNNT’s over the last 12 months.
PNNT's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as PFLT (22). This means that PNNT’s stock grew similarly to PFLT’s over the last 12 months.
| PFLT | PNNT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 39% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 17 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 69% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PFLT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PNNT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PFLT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNNT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
PFLT (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while PNNT (@Investment Managers) price change was +9.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.76%.
PFLT is expected to report earnings on Nov 23, 2026.
PNNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 23, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFLT has been closely correlated with PNNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFLT jumps, then PNNT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFLT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFLT | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| PNNT - PFLT | 72% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| OCSL - PFLT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| ARCC - PFLT | 70% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| BCSF - PFLT | 68% Closely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| BBDC - PFLT | 67% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNNT has been closely correlated with PFLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNNT jumps, then PFLT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PNNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNNT | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| PFLT - PNNT | 70% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| SCM - PNNT | 60% Loosely correlated | -5.75% | ||
| BBDC - PNNT | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| BCSF - PNNT | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| GLAD - PNNT | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||