GLBXF
Price
$0.92
Change
-$0.02 (-2.13%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
34.29M
SGML
Price
$8.24
Change
-$0.02 (-0.24%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.54B
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GLBXF vs SGML

Header iconGLBXF vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts GLBXF vs SGMLBanner chart's image
Globex Mining Enterprises
Price$0.92
Change-$0.02 (-2.13%)
Volume$33.4K
Capitalization34.29M
Sigma Lithium
Price$8.24
Change-$0.02 (-0.24%)
Volume$488.23K
Capitalization1.54B
GLBXF vs SGML Comparison Chart
Loading...
GLBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLBXF vs. SGML commentary
Apr 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLBXF is a Hold and SGML is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GLBXF: $0.92 vs. SGML: $8.24)
Brand notoriety: GLBXF and SGML are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLBXF: 90% vs. SGML: 65%
Market capitalization -- GLBXF: $34.29M vs. SGML: $1.54B
GLBXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $34.29M. SGML’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLBXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGML’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLBXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGML’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLBXF is a better buy in the long-term than SGML.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLBXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGML’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLBXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SGML’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGML is a better buy in the short-term than GLBXF.

Price Growth

GLBXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -9.80% price change this week, while SGML (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +15.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

SGML is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.82% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGML($1.54B) has a higher market cap than GLBXF($34.3M). GLBXF YTD gains are higher at: 11.515 vs. SGML (-26.560). GLBXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.43M vs. SGML (-82.05M). SGML has more cash in the bank: 38.1M vs. GLBXF (21.7M). GLBXF has less debt than SGML: GLBXF (53.2K) vs SGML (157M). SGML has higher revenues than GLBXF: SGML (130M) vs GLBXF (1.58M).
GLBXFSGMLGLBXF / SGML
Capitalization34.3M1.54B2%
EBITDA-2.43M-82.05M3%
Gain YTD11.515-26.560-43%
P/E Ratio2.90N/A-
Revenue1.58M130M1%
Total Cash21.7M38.1M57%
Total Debt53.2K157M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLBXF vs SGML: Fundamental Ratings
GLBXF
SGML
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
518
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4378
SMR RATING
1..100
5594
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5491
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2118
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLBXF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as SGML (89). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew similarly to SGML’s over the last 12 months.

GLBXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGML (78). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGML’s over the last 12 months.

GLBXF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGML (94). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGML’s over the last 12 months.

GLBXF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGML (91). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGML’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as GLBXF (21). This means that SGML’s stock grew similarly to GLBXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLBXFSGML
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GLBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIAOX17.42N/A
N/A
Hartford International Opp HLS IA
MAIMX20.94N/A
N/A
Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value A
PJDAX16.39N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend A
AULYX88.70N/A
N/A
American Century Ultra® Y
IOGYX35.14N/A
N/A
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R5

GLBXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLBXF and SGML have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLBXF and SGML's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBXF
1D Price
Change %
GLBXF100%
-2.13%
SGML - GLBXF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
FQVLF - GLBXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
TGB - GLBXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
IVPAF - GLBXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
GLNCY - GLBXF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
More

SGML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGML
1D Price
Change %
SGML100%
-0.24%
LAR - SGML
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
LAC - SGML
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
FCX - SGML
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
SCCO - SGML
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
BHP - SGML
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.23%
More